Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation, 258 N.W.2d 891.

108 citing documents.

Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981
Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981
Sargent also says we should apply the “principles underlying” but the employee has not, as yet, taken this route.
Henning v. Wineman 306 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
Henning v. Wineman 306 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
Thus, the section does not apply to the proceeds of a settlement attributable to a loss of consortium claim, or to damages that are not recoverable under workers’ compensation, the employer has no subrogation interest in those recoveries.
Rascop v. Nationwide Carriers 281 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1979
Rascop v. Nationwide Carriers 281 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1979
(1) *173 : “ * * * In Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation, supra, we held that the employer was not entitled to a credit against compensation liability out of an employee’s settlement with a third-party tort-feasor where (a) the employer ha
Paine v. Water Works Supply Co. 269 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1978
Paine v. Water Works Supply Co. 269 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1978
Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation, Minn., Liberty Mut.