Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Marzitelli, 258 N.W.2d 585.
-
Sela Investments, Ltd LLP v. J.H.
Minn. 2026
v. Marzitelli, (reviewing the plaintiffs’ standing de novo without explicitly stating the standard of review).
- A21-0403 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
- Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Rukavina v. Pawlenty
684 N.W.2d 525
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
to support its argument that RAMS must show some particularized harm to itself or its members to establish standing.
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 672 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 672 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Southern Minnesota Construction Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 637 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- SOUTHERN MN CONST. CO. v. Dept. of Transp. 637 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Southern Minnesota Construction Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 637 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- SOUTHERN MN CONST. CO. v. Dept. of Transp. 637 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Conant v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P. 603 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Conant v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P.
603 N.W.2d 143
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding state taxpayers lacked standing to challenge legislation halting construction of highway because any money lost as result originated from federal funds).
- Rupp v. Mayasich 561 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Rupp v. Mayasich
561 N.W.2d 555
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
see also Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co., 207 Minn. 277, 281 , 290 N.W.
- Kennedy v. Carlson 544 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1996
- Kennedy v. Carlson 544 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1996
- Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Baertsch v. Minnesota Department of Revenue 518 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1994
- Baertsch v. Minnesota Department of Revenue 518 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1994
- Graham v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners 515 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Graham v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners 515 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Pike v. Gunyou
488 N.W.2d 298
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(no question that taxpayers may sue to .enjoin waste or illegal use of public funds); Almquist v. City of Biwabik, 224 Minn. 503, 505 , (taxpayer directly affected by assessment).
- In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
- RS v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- RS v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- R.S. v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- R.S. v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 433 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 433 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Deantoni v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Deantoni v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Colsch 284 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Colsch
284 N.W.2d 839
Minn. 1979
See, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130