Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Matter of Campbell's Trusts, 258 N.W.2d 856.

35 citing documents.

In Re: The Jorgenson Family Trust Agreement dated March 12, 2001. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re Atwood’s Tr., see also In re Campbell’s Trs., –68 (Minn. 1977) (emphasizing that “Atwood .
In the Matter of the Trust of Robert W Moreland a/k/a Robert William Moreland. Minn. 2023
In re Hartz’s Est., 7 Indeed, “[t]he primary function of the court in exercising jurisdiction over trusts is to preserve them and to secure their administration according to their terms.” In re Campbell’s Trusts, see also Restatement (Third) of Prop.: Wills and Donative Transfers § 11.2(f) (Am.
In re the Trust of Eva Marie Hanson Living Trust dated December 11, 1995. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mary Skarsten-Dinerman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-68 (Minn. 1977) (quoting In re Atwood’s Tr.
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
mpare In re Freeman’s Trust, 247 Minn. 50, 56, (stating that there is “little dispute in the applicable law” regarding attorney fees for trustees and that the standard is that “[a] trustee is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, to be paid out of the trust estate, incurred in good faith in defending his administration of the trust”), with In re Campbell’s Trusts, (stating that non-trustee beneficiaries should be awarded attorney fees out of the trust when “the trust instruments in dispute [ar
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court may not award attorney fees if it “would permit invasion of the trust corpus for a wholly unwarranted purpose, where the litigation has conferred no benefit on the trust.” In re Campbell’s Trusts
In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital Trust 834 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital Trust 834 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
A grantor “may dispose of his property as he sees fit, and this includes corpus or principal as well as income.” In re Campbell’s Trusts, (quotation omitted).
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
“When the trust language is clear and unambiguous, we do not look beyond the [trust] instrument.” McLaughlin, d at 45 n. 1; see also In re Campbell’s Trusts, (“Where the intent of the testator-[grantor] is clear from the language of the instrument, parol evidence is not admissible....
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“The primary function of the court in exercising jurisdiction over trusts is to preserve them and to secure their administration according to their terms.”
In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re Campbell’s Trusts, see also Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 187 cmt.
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See In re Campbell’s Trusts, (under practical construction doctrine, the parties may adopt their own interpretation of “obscure or doubtful provisions” and clarify ambiguous language between themselves).
In Re the Estate of Zagar 491 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Estate of Zagar 491 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public Safety 387 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public Safety 387 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See In Matter of Campbell’s Trusts, (will); Liptak v. Karsner, 208 Minn. 168 , 293 N.W.
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Finally, “[ajbsent material ambiguities, extrinsic evidence may not be admitted to vary the plain meaning of the testator’s words.” In the Matter of Campbell’s Trusts
Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
Matter of Trust Created Under Agreement With McLaughlin 361 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1985
Matter of Trust Created Under Agreement With McLaughlin 361 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1985
-03 (Minn.1984); In Re Campbell’s Trust, In Re Trusteeship Created by Fiske, 242 Minn. 452, 460 , -11 (1954).
In Re the Trust Created by the Last Will & Testament of Ward 360 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Trust Created by the Last Will & Testament of Ward 360 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Matter of Campbell’s Trusts
In Re the Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties 311 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1981
In Re the Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties 311 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1981