Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ani, 257 N.W.2d 699.
- State v. Burns 524 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
-
State v. Shoop
441 N.W.2d 475
Minn. 1989
1 (1988), we have held that there may be cases in which the testimony of the complainant is such that a reversal by this court may be necessary absent corroboration
- State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Perkins 395 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Perkins 395 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ahiagbede 394 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ahiagbede 394 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blair 381 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blair 381 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Folley
378 N.W.2d 21
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
to support his contention: Even though corroboration is not a requirement under the statute or the constitution, “[t]he absence of corroboration in an individual case * * * may well call for a holding that there is insufficient evidence upon which a jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable
- State v. Fisler 374 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Fisler 374 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Garcia 374 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Garcia 374 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Daby 359 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Daby 359 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Loftus v. State 357 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Loftus v. State 357 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. DeBaere 356 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1984
-
State v. DeBaere
356 N.W.2d 301
Minn. 1984
1 (1982); (stating, however, that in an individual case the absence of corroboration might mandate a holding by the court that the evidence was legally insufficient).
- State v. Dornack 329 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1983
- State v. Dornack 329 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1983
- State v. Gardner 328 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Gardner
328 N.W.2d 159
Minn. 1983
that although Minn.Stat.
- State v. Nelson 326 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1982