DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ani, 257 N.W.2d 699.

127 citing documents.

  • State v. Nelson 326 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Wrightington 323 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Wrightington 323 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1982
    Without implying that corroboration was required in this case to sustain the convictions — — we hold that there was cor *795 roboration and that the evidence of defendant’s guilt was sufficient.
  • State v. Hudson 311 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Hudson 311 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1981
    1 (1980), states that the testimony of a complainant need not be corroborated in such a prosecution, that there may be individual cases in which reversal might be required absent corroboration.
  • State v. Kruse 302 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Kruse 302 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Gunn 299 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Gunn 299 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Buckhalton 296 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Steinbrink 297 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Buckhalton 296 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Steinbrink 297 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Packer 295 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Packer 295 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1980
  • Ani v. State 288 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1980
  • Ani v. State 288 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1980
    we affirmed this judgment of conviction against a number of claims, including that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient.
  • State v. Volstad 287 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Volstad 287 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1980
    1, provides that the testimony of a complainant in a case of this nature “need not be corroborated,” that there may be cases where, notwithstanding this statute, the lack of corroboration may render the evidence legally insufficient.
  • State v. Hamilton 289 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Hamilton 289 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 1979
    While it is true, quoting Note, 81 Yale L.J.
  • State v. Hesse 281 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Hesse 281 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1979
    1, which provides that “In a prosecution under sections 609.342 to 609.346, the testimony of a complainant need not be corroborated.”
  • State v. Kinyon 268 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Kinyon 268 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1978
    1, provides that “[i]n a prosecution under sections 609.342 to 609.346, the testimony of a complainant need not be corroborated.” we upheld the constitutionality of this statute and added that the goals and purposes of the corroboration requirement are served by the jury trial and by the trial judge’s power to grant relief in cases where the evidence is legally insufficient.
  • State v. Granger 261 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Granger 261 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1977