Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., 261 N.W.2d 581.
-
Allen v. Hennepin County
680 N.W.2d 560
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (considering evidence not in the record when the evidence is documentary, of a conclusive nature, and will help sustain verdicts and judgments).
- State v. LaRose 673 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. LaRose
673 N.W.2d 157
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co. Ltd., -585 (Minn.1977); Moose v. Vesey, 225 Minn. 64, 67
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota 614 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota
614 N.W.2d 764
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- Williams Pipeline Co. v. Soo Line Railroad 597 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Williams Pipeline Co. v. Soo Line Railroad
597 N.W.2d 340
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
P. 110.01; Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- In Re Livingood 594 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
-
In Re Livingood
594 N.W.2d 889
Minn. 1999
In re Real Property Taxes for 1980 As sessment; , 718 n. 3 (Minn.1983) (citing Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 122 , Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., -84 (Minn.1977)).
- Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 574 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss
574 N.W.2d 107
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“[a]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and * * * matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.”) Reversed and remanded.
- Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital 568 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital
568 N.W.2d 535
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.
- Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc.
558 N.W.2d 507
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.
- Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A. 534 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security
535 N.W.2d 372
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
-
Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R
535 N.W.2d 372
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
-
Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A.
534 N.W.2d 734
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- Matter of Pirkl 531 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Matter of Pirkl
531 N.W.2d 902
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Minn.R.Civ.App.P.
- Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
518 N.W.2d 41
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Larson
520 N.W.2d 456
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., -84 (Minn.1977).
- Wicken v. Morris 510 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Wicken v. Morris
510 N.W.2d 246
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
110.01; Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- Chahla v. City of St. Paul 507 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Chahla v. City of St. Paul
507 N.W.2d 29
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (citations omitted).
- Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 498 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11
498 N.W.2d 309
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Minn. R.Civ.App.P.
- Miller v. International Express Corp. 495 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Miller v. International Express Corp.
495 N.W.2d 616
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl, & Co., Ltd.
- Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance 494 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1993
-
Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance
494 N.W.2d 885
Minn. 1993
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., Moose v. Vesey, 225 Minn. 64
- Hayes v. Wrico Stamping Griffiths Corp. 490 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Hayes v. Wrico Stamping Griffiths Corp.
490 N.W.2d 672
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership
474 N.W.2d 370
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Holman v. CPT CORP.
457 N.W.2d 740
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Holman did not specifically raise this issue before the trial court; therefore, it is questionable whether it is properly before us. See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.
- City of Willmar Municipal Utilities Commission v. Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n 452 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
City of Willmar Municipal Utilities Commission v. Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n
452 N.W.2d 699
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.
- In Re Estate of Magnus 444 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
In Re Estate of Magnus
444 N.W.2d 295
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“[A]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and * * * matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.
- Thiele v. Stich 425 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1988
-
Thiele v. Stich
425 N.W.2d 580
Minn. 1988
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., Minn.R.Civ.App.P.110.
- LeClair v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987