Cited by

” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.

“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

“[P]roduction of record evidence is never allowed in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co. , (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not bas e its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.”).

“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

“[A]n appellate court may not base its d ecision on matters outside the record on appeal,” and “matters not produced and received in ev idence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., see also Minn. R. Civ.

Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., In re Welfare of Child of J.K.T.

Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

isstated inference[s] could arise as the Appellate Court considers [its decision].” But, while “appellate courts, in order to sustain verdicts and judgments, will permit omissions to be supplied by documentary evidence of a conclusive nature,” the “production of record evidence is never allowed in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co. , -84 (Minn. 1977).

App. P. 110.01 (providing that the record on appeal consists of all documents filed in the district court and transcripts); Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.”).

App. P. 110.01 (defining the record on appeal as the documents filed in the district court and any transcript of proceedings); Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters 14 outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.”).

See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (noting that ULJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence); see also Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (applying harmless-error rule to ULJ’s evidentiary ruling).

The rules of evidence may be used as a guide in determining the quality of evidence offered.”); cf. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (stating with regard to documents “presented and discussed” at a ULJ hearing but not included in the evidence on appeal, that “in view of the sufficiency of the evidence and because we are convinced that the appeal tribunal’s decision would be affirmed even if the disputed documents were consider

“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

But “[i]t is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., 11

7 We may not consider “matters not produced and received in evidence below,” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., but a party need not formally present documents as evidence for the files to be considered, Phillips-Klein Cos., Inc. v. Tiffany P’ship

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal .

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may 5 not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered”).2 In sum, the record for this appeal is limite

8; Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.”).

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal .

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., -84 (Minn.1977).

Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (articulating well-settled principle that appellate courts must not base decisions on matters outside record on appeal).

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (“[Pjroduction of record evidence is never allowed in *560 an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment.”).

8, the record on appeal consists of "the papers filed in the trial court, the offered exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings, if any.” "It is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and that matters not produced and received in evidence below may not be considered.” Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (holding that under circumstances of case, failure to formally admit documents was harmless).

Although we may consider extra-record documentary evidence that has conclusive value and that supports the result obtained at the district court, -96 (Minn.1999), such evidence may not serve as the basis for reversing the district court’s decision, Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co.