Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of the Welfare of Kidd, 261 N.W.2d 833.

82 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 369 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 369 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The “clearly erroneous” standard is applied to the trial court’s findings, but not as in the ordinary civil case: “ * * * [T]his court will continue to exercise great caution in termination proceedings, finding such action proper only when the evidence clearly mandates such a result in accordance with statutory grounds.”
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963 692 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In Re the Welfare of L.J.B. 356 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of L.J.B. 356 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
Finally, this court, while giving deference to the findings of the trial court, will exercise great caution in termination proceedings, filed January 25, 1980.
Matter of Welfare of Solomon 291 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Solomon 291 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1980
dings of fact by the trial judge will not be overturned in a termination case unless “clearly erroneous,” , 428 (Minn.1978), this court has also stated that it “will continue to exercise great caution in termination proceedings, finding such action proper only when the evidence clearly mandates such a result in accordance with the statutory grounds.”
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
In the case of a termination proceeding under Minn.Stat.
In Re Welfare of H. M. P. W. 281 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1979
In Re Welfare of H. M. P. W. 281 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1979
See, (in which this court expressly declined to classify mental illness as conduct permitting termination of parental rights).
Petition of Linehan 280 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1979
Petition of Linehan 280 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1979
Matter of Welfare of Sharp 268 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1978
Matter of Welfare of Sharp 268 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1978
See, also, In re Estate of Balafas, 293 Minn. 94

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by