Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808.

576 citing documents.

White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 567 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership, -69 (Minn.1984) ().
In re the Resolution of the City of Austin 567 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In re the Resolution of the City of Austin 567 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stang v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Ass'n Board of Trustees 566 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stang v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Ass'n Board of Trustees 566 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rosinski v. Teachers Retirement Ass’n Bd.
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Proposal by Lakedale Telephone Co. to Offer Three Additional Class Services 561 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Proposal by Lakedale Telephone Co. to Offer Three Additional Class Services 561 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In re the Retirement Benefits of Yetka 554 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In re the Retirement Benefits of Yetka 554 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(applying the statutory standard to a public service commission decision).
In Re the Appeal of the Crow Wing County Attorney 552 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Appeal of the Crow Wing County Attorney 552 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
On appeal, the role of this court is to review the record independently “to determine whether the county board has acted arbitrarily or unreasonably in violation of the standards prescribed by law.” ().
Claim of City of Mankato v. Mahoney 542 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Claim of City of Mankato v. Mahoney 542 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Application of Allers 533 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Application of Allers 533 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ly unjust, inferences must be accepted even though it may appear that contrary inferences would be better supported; 2) substantial judicial deference to the fact-finding processes of the administrative agency; and 3) the burden is upon appellant to establish that the findings of the agency are not supported by the evidence in the record, considered in its entirety.” (quoting trial court and noting its statement of law was correct).
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-26 (Minn.1977); see Mammenga v. State, Dep't of Human Servs., (an agency's decision is presumed to be correct).
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-26 (Minn.1977); see Mammenga v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs., (an agency’s decision is presumed to be correct).
Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N 529 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N 529 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources 531 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources 531 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture 528 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture 528 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Ex Rel. Laux v. Gallagher 527 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Ex Rel. Laux v. Gallagher 527 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Application of Burlington Northern R. Co. 522 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Application of Burlington Northern R. Co. 522 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Black 522 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Black 522 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(reviewing court should show deference to an agency’s expertise and special knowledge).
Petition of Northern States Power Gas Utility 519 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Petition of Northern States Power Gas Utility 519 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(reviewing court *17 defers' to agency’s expertise and special knowledge in the field of its “technical training, education and experience”).
In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Center on March 2, 1992 518 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Center on March 2, 1992 518 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Olson v. Chippewa County Social Services 515 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by