Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808.

576 citing documents.

Olson v. Chippewa County Social Services 515 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Ramsey 513 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Ramsey 513 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“We view that by the ‘substantial evidence’ test is meant: 1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; 2) more than a scintilla of evidence; 3) more than ‘some evidence’; 4) more than ‘any evidence’; and 5) evidence considered in its entirety.” (citing trial court as correct).
In Re the Involuntary Discharge or Transfer of J.S. Ex Rel. Hall 512 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Involuntary Discharge or Transfer of J.S. Ex Rel. Hall 512 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Inc., (an agency decision will be reversed if "unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted”); (defining "substantial evidence”).
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 502 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1993
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 502 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1993
In Re Certificate of Need for Construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 501 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Certificate of Need for Construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 501 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(courts should defer to agency’s expertise in the field of its training, education, and experience).
In Re ST 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re ST 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
see also Cable Communications Bd.
In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service 500 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service 500 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
School Service Employees Local No. 284 v. Independent School District No. 270 499 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
School Service Employees Local No. 284 v. Independent School District No. 270 499 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In re Adopt S.T. 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In re Adopt S.T. 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
see also Cable Communications Bd.
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
Harford v. University of Minnesota 494 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rosinski v. TEACHERS RET. ASS'N 495 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Harford v. University of Minnesota 494 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The Minnesota Supreme Court has defined substantial evidence as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
Rosinski v. TEACHERS RET. ASS'N 495 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Combined Air & Solid Waste Permit No. 2211-91-OT-1 489 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Combined Air & Solid Waste Permit No. 2211-91-OT-1 489 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Petition of Hyman Freightways, Inc. 488 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Petition of Hyman Freightways, Inc. 488 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc. 486 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc. 486 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Northern States Power Co. v. Blue Earth County 473 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Northern States Power Co. v. Blue Earth County 473 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ross v. State, Department of Human Services 469 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ross v. State, Department of Human Services 469 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hennepin County Community Services Department v. Hale 470 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hennepin County Community Services Department v. Hale 470 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 469 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Crawford v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 468 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Lake Elmo v. City of Oakdale 468 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Lake Elmo v. City of Oakdale 468 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 469 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
The deference shown to agency expertise restricts “judicial functions to a narrow area of responsibility.” cited in Pettersen, d at 244 .
Crawford v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 468 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Anderson's Application for Disability Benefits 468 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Anderson's Application for Disability Benefits 468 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
County of Scott v. Public Employment Relations Board 461 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
County of Scott v. Public Employment Relations Board 461 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re An Investigation of Unfair Election Practices Objections 461 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1990
In re An Investigation of Unfair Election Practices Objections 461 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1990
2 “ ‘[U]nless manifestly unjust, inferences must be accepted even though it may appear that contrary inferences would be better supported * *
Myers v. City of Oakdale 461 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1990