DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Strimling, 265 N.W.2d 423.

92 citing documents.

  • Kamal Elyas Maqadin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. Cole 766 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. Cole 766 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    -31 (Minn.1978) (stating as part of an analysis of criminal liability for diversion of corporate funds that “[i]n the realm of closely held corporations, the role of the silent strong man is a familiar one,” and it would be “ill-advised” to allow such a person “to insulate himself from liability ...
  • State v. Reed 737 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Reed 737 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
  • State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
  • State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Souvannarath 545 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Souvannarath 545 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1996
    Further, “[wlhere the accused plays at least some knowing role in the commission of the crime and takes no steps to thwart its completion, the jury may properly infer the requisite mens rea for a conviction of aiding and abetting.”
  • State v. Pierson 530 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Pierson 530 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1995
    Merrill, d at 368 (citations omitted); reh’g denied (Minn., March 29, 1978).
  • State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Kramer 441 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Kramer 441 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    (theft by swindle statute is intended to proscribe a form of conduct rather than a specific act); (partners criminally liable for diverting corporate property chargeable only with aiding and abetting specific act of submitting false report).
  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Morrison’s failure to take any steps to thwart Olson’s abusive conduct is a fact from which the jury reasonably could infer “the requisite mens rea for a conviction of aiding and abetting.”
  • Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    Under the law, “person[s] may be held criminally liable as an aider and abettor without actively participating in the overt act constituting the primary offense; moreover, criminal intent may be inferred from * * * conduct before and after the offenses are committed.” (emphasis added); (holding corporate officer liable as aider and abettor in filing of false reports even though reports were not authorized or approved of by officers).
  • Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    (-29 (Minn.1978)), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
    A conviction for aiding and abetting requires only “some knowing role in the commission of the crime” by a defendant who “takes no steps to thwart its completion.” Jones, d at 801 ().
  • State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    All that is necessary for a conviction of aiding in a crime is that “the accused plays at least some knowing role in the commission of the crime and takes no steps to thwart its completion.”
  • State v. Williams 415 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Williams 415 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (accomplice liability for making a false claim to a public body).
  • State v. Boyd 410 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Boyd 410 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Smeriglio 409 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Smeriglio 409 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Starnes 396 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Starnes 396 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Stoffel 388 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Stoffel 388 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Collins v. State 385 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Collins v. State 385 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hathaway 379 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Hathaway 379 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1985
    -66 (Minn.1980); -32 (Minn.1978); State v. Swenson, 301 Minn. 199, 201-02
  • State v. Higgins 376 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Higgins 376 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    comment; -32 (Minn.1978).
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of T.M.V. 368 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1985