Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. Snelgrove, 269 N.W.2d 918.
-
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Starkey
535 N.W.2d 363
Minn. 1995
-22 (Minn.1978) this court acknowledged the value of Pierringer releases.
- M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- National Family Insurance v. Bunton 509 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
National Family Insurance v. Bunton
509 N.W.2d 565
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-22 (Minn.1978) (explaining Pierringer releases).
- Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc.
495 N.W.2d 897
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(release agreement admissible under Rule 408 to prove bias; trial court’s deviation will not constitute error if its modification substantially protects the rights of all parties and preserves the adversary process).
- Junker v. Allstate Insurance Co. 489 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Junker v. Allstate Insurance Co.
489 N.W.2d 821
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(prescribing Minnesota practice on settlement and release under Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis.2d 182 , ).
- Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Vang v. Vang
490 N.W.2d 647
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
.1, 3, 8 (1977), , 920 n. 1 (Minn.1978).
- Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Pirkov-Middaugh Ex Rel. Middaugh v. Gillette Children's Hospital 479 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Pirkov-Middaugh Ex Rel. Middaugh v. Gillette Children's Hospital
479 N.W.2d 63
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(trial court should submit fault of parties to the jury even if they have been dismissed).
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Retrum 456 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Retrum
456 N.W.2d 719
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(it is within the trial court’s discretion whether to admit details of a settlement agreement).
- Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Balder v. Haley 441 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Balder v. Haley 441 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Annandale Advocate v. City of Annandale 435 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1989
- Annandale Advocate v. City of Annandale 435 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1989
- Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
- Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
- Schneider v. Buckman 433 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1988
-
Schneider v. Buckman
433 N.W.2d 98
Minn. 1988
-22 (Minn.1978), this court stated the basic elements of a Pierringer release require: (1) The release of the settling defendants from the action and the discharge of a part of the cause of action equal to that part attributable to the settling defendants' causal negligence; (2) The reservation of the remainder of
- Denzer v. Frisch 430 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Denzer v. Frisch
430 N.W.2d 471
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
920 n. 1 (Minn.1978) (citing Simonett, Release of Joint Tortfeasors: Use of the Pierringer Release in Minnesota, 3 Wm.Mitchell L.Rev.
- Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Rambaum v. Swisher
423 N.W.2d 68
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“[C]ourts should encourage settlements openly made with prompt and adequate notice to the trial judge and all interested parties.”
- Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
- Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
- Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1987
-
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
410 N.W.2d 324
Minn. 1987
One defendant, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, instituted third-party proceedings against API, Inc. Prior to trial five defendant manufacturers entered into settlement agreements with Parsons 1 and were dismissed with prejudice from Parsons’
- Campbell v. Valley State Agency 407 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Campbell v. Valley State Agency
407 N.W.2d 109
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(Pierringer release); appeal after remand, pet.
- Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 402 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1987
-
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co.
402 N.W.2d 794
Minn. 1987
920 n. 1 (Minn.1978); Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis.2d 182, 184-85 , Simonett, Release of Joint Tort-feasors: Use of the Pierringer Release in Minnesota, 3 Wm.
- Hosley v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. 401 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987