Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. Snelgrove, 269 N.W.2d 918.

157 citing documents.

Hosley v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. 401 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ripka v. Mehus 390 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ripka v. Mehus 390 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the court stated that, as a general rule, If there is “evidence of conduct which, if believed by the jury, would constitute negligence [or fault] on the part of the person * * * inquired about,” the fault or negligence of that party should be submitted to the jury.
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 387 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 387 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While appellant cites the general rule of Serr, approved the use of the Pierringer releases in Minnesota and created a specific exception to the Serr rule.
Polacec v. Voigt 385 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Polacec v. Voigt 385 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
to argue that the trial court erred in not allowing the jury to learn of the settlement between Kaczor and respondent.
Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co. 383 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1986
Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co. 383 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1986
The release, first accepted by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis.2d 182 , reserves the plaintiff’s right to maintain a cause of action against any nonsettling defendant, but releases from liability any defendant who is a party to the settlement agreement.
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis.2d 182
Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeder's Ass'n 374 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeder's Ass'n 374 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellants further claim that the trial court erred in submitting appellants’ negligence to the jury.
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 376 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1985
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 376 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1985
see generally Simonett, Release of Joint Tortfeasors: Use of The Pierringer Release in Minnesota, 3 Wm.
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Galloway 373 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1985
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Galloway 373 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1985
Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co. 364 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co. 364 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
When parties agree to a mid-trial settlement, “the trial court and other parties should be immediately notified, and the terms of the agreement made a part of the record.”
Quill v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Quill v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Galloway 354 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Galloway 354 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
a plaintiff pursuing claims against multiple parties may settle with any number of them, yet preserve a claim for proportional shares of the damages against the remaining defendants.
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Klimek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Agency 348 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Klimek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Agency 348 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
However, where a settlement agreement between a plaintiff and one of several joint tortfeasors incorporates the basic elements of a one consequence is that the non-settling tortfeasor is liable only for that part of the award attributable to his percentage of causal negligence.
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
The manner and extent to which the settlement agreement is to be disclosed to the jury at the new trial is not now before us, but see, generally
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
wherein we stated that as a general rule the amount paid in settlement should never be submitted to a jury.
Shantz v. Richview, Inc. 311 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1981
Shantz v. Richview, Inc. 311 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1981
the jury was informed of the settlement but not of the amount paid and the jury was required to decide the negligence of both defendant and the dismissed third-party defendant, the comparative percentage of negligence, and the total damages sustained by plaintiff.
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
Sorenson v. Kruse 293 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1980