Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ford, 276 N.W.2d 178.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
But when a “defendant was present when his counsel made the waiver of jury trial on entrapment issue, defendant may well be said to have ratified the waiver and made it his personal act.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Diego Hernan Suqui-Carchipulla Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Diego Hernan Suqui-Carchipulla Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State v. Christenson 827 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Christenson 827 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Kuhlmann 806 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2011
- State v. Fitzpatrick 690 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Fitzpatrick 690 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Halseth 653 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Halseth
653 N.W.2d 782
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
The only support cited by the state for its position that defense counsel can waive these types of rights for a
- State v. Oanes 543 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Oanes 543 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Balduc 514 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Balduc
514 N.W.2d 607
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
in which the supreme court held that an attorney’s waiver of the defendant’s right to a jury decision on the issue of entrapment was valid.
- State v. Johnson 511 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Johnson 511 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- In Re the Welfare of G.D. 473 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- In Re the Welfare of G.D. 473 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State, City of Tracy v. Neuman 392 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State, City of Tracy v. Neuman
392 N.W.2d 706
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(defendant’s presence and acceptance of counsel’s oral waiver on the record ratified the waiver of jury trial).
- State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Sandmoen
390 N.W.2d 419
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
which indicated that jury trial on a •particular issue may be waived by counsel on behalf of his client.
- State v. Olson 361 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Olson 361 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Vaughn 361 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Vaughn
361 N.W.2d 54
Minn. 1985
State v. Grilli, 304 Minn. 80
- State v. Abraham 335 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Abraham
335 N.W.2d 745
Minn. 1983
State v. Grilli, 304 Minn. 80, 96 , .
- State v. Crist 281 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Crist
281 N.W.2d 657
Minn. 1979
Pursuant to the procedures established in State v. Grilli, 304 Minn. 80 , — —defendant waived her right to a jury trial on the entrapment issue, electing instead to have the trial court act as factfinder on the issue.