Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Country Liquors, Inc. v. City Council of Minneapolis, 264 N.W.2d 821.

23 citing documents.

City of Blaine, a Municipal Corporation v. Shanice Chante Hines-Hyatt, Relator Minn. Ct. App. 2024
City of Blaine, a Municipal Corporation v. Shanice Chante Hines-Hyatt, Relator Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And “a city council is vested with broad 2 discretion in its consideration of a liquor license application.” Country Liquors, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Cigarette/Tobacco - Product Shop License held by Bright Star Inc. d/b/a/ Tom and … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[T]he burden is on [relator] to demonstrate the arbitrariness of the council’s action.” Countr y Liquors
Target Corporation, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Julia Wang, d/b/a Orchid Massage Spa, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Country Liquors, Inc., v. City Council of Minneapolis
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
Country Liquors, (reviewing a city council’s denial of a liquor license on certiorari).
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“[T]he burden is on [relator] to demonstrate the arbitrariness of the [agency’s] action.” Country Liquors
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Country Liquors, (city council has broad discretion to decide whether to issue liquor license based on evidence presented to council); Godfather, -71 (Minn.App.1985) (same), pet.
Bergmann v. City of Melrose 420 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bergmann v. City of Melrose 420 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Anton's, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 375 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anton's, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 375 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bird v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bird v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Cable Communications Board, d at 666 (“[respondent had no property interest at stake * * * because it had a mere expectation of and desire for a cable franchise, but no legitimate claim of entitlement to a franchise award * * *.”); Country Liquors, (there is no property interest in an unissued liquor license); State v. City of Austin, 246 Minn. 514, 519 , (a prior expired pinball machine license was functus officio and did not entitle licensee to greater renewal rights than other applicants)
Hymanson v. City of St. Paul 329 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
Hymanson v. City of St. Paul 329 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
Country Liquors, quoting Arens v. Village of Rogers, 240 Minn. 386, 401 , , appeal dismissed, 347 U.S. 949 , 74 S.Ct.
Tamarac Inn, Inc. v. City of Long Lake 310 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1981
Ruzich v. Township of Stuntz 295 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1980