Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Manthei v. Manthei, 268 N.W.2d 45.

54 citing documents.

In Re the Custody of MIVB; Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“[Parenting-time] rights are not absolute and are to be exercised only when in the best interest of the child.”).
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Rights to parenting time “are not absolute and are to be exercised only when in the best interest of the child.”
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
des that “the court shall, upon the request of either parent, grant such parenting time on behalf of the child and a parent as will enable the child and the parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interests of the child.” But “[parenting-time] rights are not absolute and are to be exercised only when in the best interest[s] of the child.”
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[parenting-time] rights are not absolute and are to be exercised only when in the best interest of the child.”
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
S. M. K. v. D. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
S. M. K. v. D. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Beardsley v. Garcia 753 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 2008
Beardsley v. Garcia 753 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 2008
“[T]he discretion of the trial court in deciding questions relating to visitation is extensive,” and the facts of this case indicate that the district court acted within its discretion in awarding temporary parenting time to Garcia.
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Foster on Behalf of J.B. v. Brooks 546 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Foster on Behalf of J.B. v. Brooks 546 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Olson v. Olson 534 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1995
Olson v. Olson 534 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1995
Gray v. Hauschildt 528 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gray v. Hauschildt 528 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Courey v. Courey 524 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of Courey v. Courey 524 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of Al-Zouhayli v. Al-Zouhayli 486 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Al-Zouhayli v. Al-Zouhayli 486 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Trial courts have broad discretion in deciding questions relating to visitation, and that discretion has been upheld where exercised to refuse to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of visitation.
Marriage of Moravick v. Moravick 461 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Moravick v. Moravick 461 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Jep v. Jcp 432 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
J.E.P. v. J.C.P. 432 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Jep v. Jcp 432 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
J.E.P. v. J.C.P. 432 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
J.M.G. v. J.C.G. 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Jmg v. Jcg 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
J.M.G. v. J.C.G. 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
see also Minn. Stat. § 518.175 , subd.
Jmg v. Jcg 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
see also Minn. Stat. § 518.175 , subd.
Marriage of Uhl v. Uhl 413 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Uhl v. Uhl 413 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Gregory v. Gregory 408 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Gregory v. Gregory 408 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kuebelbeck v. Humphrey 402 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kuebelbeck v. Humphrey 402 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hofer v. Hofer 386 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hofer v. Hofer 386 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fontaine v. Hoffman 359 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fontaine v. Hoffman 359 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by