Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.

559 citing documents.

State v. Trotter 354 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Burnsville v. Brastad 354 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Burnsville v. Brastad 354 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Ibarra 355 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1984
State v. Ibarra 355 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1984
State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
State v. Tiessen 354 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. St. Cyr 354 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. St. Cyr 354 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-452 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
State v. Tiessen 354 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-452 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. O'Brien 352 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. O'Brien 352 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Campion 353 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Campion 353 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wajda, 296 Minn. 29, 32
State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In reviewing a claim by a defendant that the evidence submitted at trial was insufficient to form the basis for a conviction, an appellate court “cannot retry the facts but must take the view most favorable to the State and must assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.”
State v. Heinzer 347 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Heinzer 347 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
See State v. Keaton, 258 Minn. 359
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
A which framed the question as established in Biron to be “whether the detectives’ statements to defendant amount to ‘persuasive arguments calculated to induce a confession.’ ” Id.
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
: In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
State v. Ulvinen 313 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1981
State v. Ulvinen 313 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1981
State v. Dokken 312 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1981
State v. Dokken 312 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1981
-57 (Minn.1980); State v. Bergland, 290 Minn. 249, 253
State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
d at 91 ; d at 901; d at 544
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
in which this court stated: In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.
State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
State v. Lund, 277 Minn. 90
State v. Curtis 295 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by