Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop, 278 N.W.2d 545.

32 citing documents.

A19-1878 Minn. 2021
Roger Aspengren, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin, 257 Minn. 436, 442- 43, (rejecting a district court’s factual findings only “if they are not fairly supported by the evidence as a whole”); Buettner, d at 203 (applying “clearly erroneous” standard of review).
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prior Lake asserts that we apply a de novo standard of review, in support.
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
that “the district court erred when it concluded that [Mini Storage’s] property received a special benefit of only $52,000 as a result of the project.” The city argues that “the decision of the district court is reviewed de novo, with impartial scrutiny of all the evidence” and that this court “need not accept any findings of the court below.” in support of de novo appellate review.
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
“The right to a jury trial must be found either in the Minnesota Constitution or provided specifically by statute.”
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Abraham also limited the supreme court’s which held that a party appealing a special assessment had no right to a jury trial because there is no common law right to appeal a special assessment.
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
1, so that right, if it exists, must arise under the constitution
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
contended that they were entitled to a jury trial in the appeal of a municipal special assessment to the district court.
In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-49 (Minn.1979); Nyquist v. Town of Center, Crow Wing County, 312 Minn. 266, 269-70
Mortenson v. State 446 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Mortenson v. State 446 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See, (no right of jury trial for appeals of special assessments in the absence of express statutory language).
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(de novo review was proper, no before and after market improvement valuation was made prior to the assessment); (the trial court was reversed because it did not afford de novo review on appeal from a special assessment; a reassessment hear
Matter of Branch A-38, Jt. Ditch No. 204 406 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1987
Matter of Branch A-38, Jt. Ditch No. 204 406 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1987
-10 (Minn.1981), we rejected the contention that the date of trial should control for determining damages in a condemnation proceeding during a time of increasing land values, stating it was the established rule “that condemnation damages are assessed as of the date of the commission award.” (a special assessment case).
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Id.; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93
Schmidtbauer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schmidtbauer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Habel v. City of Chisago City 346 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Habel v. City of Chisago City 346 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wessen v. Village of Deephaven, 284 Minn. 296, 298

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by