Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 262 N.W.2d 312.

114 citing documents.

Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Quality Council, (“Although the judiciary has the responsibility of ensuring that administrative agencies comply with legislative mandates, a presumption of administrative regularity exists.”).
Rochester v. PEOPLE'S CO-OP. POWER ASS'N 466 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rochester v. PEOPLE'S CO-OP. POWER ASS'N 466 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 467 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 467 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Quality Council, (discussing “grandfather” clauses).
City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'n 466 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'n 466 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re City of White Bear Lake's Request for an Electric Utility Service Area Change Within Its City … 443 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re City of White Bear Lake's Request for an Electric Utility Service Area Change Within Its City … 443 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Westling Mfg., Inc. 442 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Westling Mfg., Inc. 442 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson 440 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson 440 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
State ex rel. Bouza v. Gregg 435 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State ex rel. Bouza v. Gregg 435 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Greater Morrison Sanitary Landfill 435 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Greater Morrison Sanitary Landfill 435 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., , 854 n. 17 (Minn.1985) (citing No Power Line, ).
In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Because the dispute involves only the interpretation and application of law by an administrative agency, we need not defer to the agency’s conclusions which are “based on legal rather than factual considerations.” No Power Line
Bouza v. Gallagher 416 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bouza v. Gallagher 416 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
However, when an administrative agency’s conclusions are “based on legal rather than factual considerations, the reviewing court is not bound by the decision of the agency and need not defer to agency expertise.” No Power Line
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See No Power Line, Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. Caballero, 302 Minn. 329, 341
Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board 369 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1985
Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board 369 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1985
See, No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, Inc., Blue Earth County Welfare Dept. v. Ca-bellero, 302 Minn. 329, 341
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1985
Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 358 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1984
Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 358 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1984
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
25, is a question of law "upon which this court is free to exercise its independent judgment," and "need not defer to agency expertise," see No Power Line
Central Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 356 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Central Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 356 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
J.C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 353 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Antl v. State, Department of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 240 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Antl v. State, Department of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 240 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
J.C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 353 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
an agency’s construction of statutory language where the statute is phrased in,common, rather than exceedingly technical, terms, see Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service Commission, 291 Minn. 241, 245-46 , or where interpretation of the statute is based on legal, rather than factual, considerations, No Power Line
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
State ex rel. Citizens Against Power Plant Pollution, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board 305 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1981
State ex rel. Citizens Against Power Plant Pollution, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board 305 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1981
5 In No Power Line, this court considered the question of whether a utility which had filed a statement seeking the exemption provided by the second half of that “savings clause” could subsequently waive the exemption and submit to PPSA siting of its proposed line.
Soo Line Railroad v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 304 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1981
Soo Line Railroad v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 304 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1981
In Re Wilmarth Line of the C U Project 299 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1980
In Re Wilmarth Line of the C U Project 299 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1980
Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 289 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1980
Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 289 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1980