Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 262 N.W.2d 312.

114 citing documents.

Approving the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for Archer Datacenters Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and Negative … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Indeed, “MEPA’s purpose is ‘to force agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental considerations before reaching their decisions.’” (quoting No Power Line, Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council, ), rev. denied (Minn. July 28, 1995).
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
8 “MEPA’s purpose is ‘to force agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental considerations before reaching their decisions.’” (quoting No Power Line, Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council, ), rev. denied (Minn. July 28, 1995).
Application for a Sulfate Site-Specific Standard for Hay Lake (AUID 31-0037-00), located downstream of the U.S. Steel - … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
No. Power Line, Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council
In the Matter of the Decision on the Petition Requesting the Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 116D.01 -.11 (2022), exists “to force agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental 5 considerations before reaching their decisions.” (quoting No Power Line, Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council, ), rev. denied (Minn. July 28, 1995).
Minn. 2021
See, e.g., Lee, at 538–39; No Power Line, Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council
In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Ltd. 930 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A18-1291 A18-1292 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Quality Council , d 312, 323 n.28 (Minn. 1977) (noting that court had used federal caselaw to interpret MEPA); In re N.D.
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Quality Council, (stating that purpose of MEPA is “to force agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental considerations before reaching their decisions”).
Marriage of Gossman v. Gossman 847 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Gossman v. Gossman 847 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Quality Council, Davidner v. Davidner, 304 Minn. 491, 493 , Huhn v. Foley Bros., 221 Minn. 279, 286 , *725
Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young America 834 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young America 834 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Quality Council, see also Fryberger v. Twp.
Marriage of Perry v. Perry 749 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marriage of Perry v. Perry 749 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Quality Council, -31 (Minn.1977).
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Allen v. City of Mendota Heights 694 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Allen v. City of Mendota Heights 694 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Quality Council, (stating that MEPA “force[s] agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental considerations before reaching their decisions”).
Northern States Power Co. v. Gas Services, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Northern States Power Co. v. Gas Services, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 683 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2004
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 683 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2004
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
Quality Council, (stating that parties cannot confer subject-matter jurisdiction on a court by consent).
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
McEa v. Mpca 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McEa v. Mpca 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 632 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Info Tel Communications, LLC v. U.S. West Communications, Inc. 592 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Info Tel Communications, LLC v. U.S. West Communications, Inc. 592 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Quality Council, (reviewing courts are not bound by the agency’s decisions on questions of law and need not defer to the agency’s expertise); cf. St.
In Re the Quantification of Environmental Costs 578 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Quantification of Environmental Costs 578 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Quality Council, (although judiciary has responsibility of ensuring administrative agencies comply with legislative .mandates, presumption of administrative regularity exists).
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
3315 , 92 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986); No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Envt’l Quality Council, see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (1994) (setting forth grounds for judicial reversal or modification of agency decision).
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Quality Council, cf. St.
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Quality Council, cf. St.
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources 531 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources 531 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
I. Potential for Significant Environmental Effects MEPA’s purpose is “to force agencies to make their own impartial evaluation of environmental considerations before reaching their decisions.” No Power Line
Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp. 517 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp. 517 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See No Power Line, (subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred on court by party’s consent).