Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc., 299 N.W.2d 414.

36 citing documents.

Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Credo Salon and Spa, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Plastics, Inc. , (requiring plaintiff to prove that lost profits resulted from the alleged defect: “the plaintiff failed to isolat e the losses attributab le to the defective tanks” from “losses due to all of the other variable and imponderable factors which may have accounted for its decline in earnings”).
Jensen v. Duluth Area YMCA 688 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Jensen v. Duluth Area YMCA 688 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
E.g., Hydra-Mac, d at 920 ; Polaris Indus, v. Plastics, Inc., Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
v. Plastics, Inc., (); Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. Summit Constr.
Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
However, we do take this opportunity to reaffirm our holding in Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc., where we cautioned that industry-wide sales figures computed from voluntarily submitted information generally lack sufficient reliability for admission.
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ); Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
In Re Estate of Renczykowski 409 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Estate of Renczykowski 409 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Pischke v. Kellen 384 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pischke v. Kellen 384 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Once a loss is established, “the difficulty of proving its amount will not preclude recovery so long as there is proof of a reasonable basis upon which to approximate the amount.” Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc., (quoting Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc., ).
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The interest referred to in Katz’s complaint was in regard to the claim that Williams’ debt was liquidated, which would entitle Katz to pre-judgment interest on the debt pursuant to Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc., -19 (Minn.1980).
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
See Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance, Continental Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1983
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance, Continental Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1983
It seems fair only to permit interest once the bills for attorney fees are made available to CNA, and thus are “readily ascertainable.” See Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by