Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co., 270 N.W.2d 107.
-
Ammie Murphy, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (verdict irreconcilable in car -accident case where jury found driver not negligent, township negligent, but township’s negligence not direct cause of accident).
- Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
- Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
- LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Roemer v. Martin 440 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1989
- Roemer v. Martin 440 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1989
- Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
- Clark v. Miller 378 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Clark v. Miller
378 N.W.2d 838
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Reese v. Henke, 277 Minn. 151, 155 , ).
- MacHo v. Mahowald 374 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- MacHo v. Mahowald 374 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Thorn v. Glass Depot 373 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- E.L.E.S.C.O. v. Northern States Power Co. 370 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
E.L.E.S.C.O. v. Northern States Power Co.
370 N.W.2d 700
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The evidence and inferences must be viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, and a contrary judgment should be granted only when there is “no competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.”
- Olson v. Havir Manufacturing Co. of St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Olson v. Havir Manufacturing Co. of St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Willmar Cookie Co. v. Pippin Pecan Co. 357 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Willmar Cookie Co. v. Pippin Pecan Co.
357 N.W.2d 111
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ANALYSIS I On review, this court may set aside the answer to a special verdict question “only if perverse and palpably contrary to the evidence, or where the evidence is so clear as to leave no room for differences among reasonable persons.” ().
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago South 310 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1981
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago South 310 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1981
- Byrns v. St. Louis County 295 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1980
- Byrns v. St. Louis County 295 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1980