Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority House, 276 N.W.2d 63.

226 citing documents.

Warner v. Commissioner of Public Safety 498 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lakeview Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. Le Rivage, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lakeview Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. Le Rivage, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of McPherson 476 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of McPherson 476 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Amoco Oil Co. v. Jones 467 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Amoco Oil Co. v. Jones 467 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co. 450 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co. 450 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
68 n. 2 (Minn.1979) (citing Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 399 , ).
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Suburban National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Suburban National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 434 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co. 415 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co. 415 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
McCullough v. Travelers Companies 415 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sernak v. Krenzen Cadillac, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
McCullough v. Travelers Companies 415 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sernak v. Krenzen Cadillac, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Eagles Lodge, 282 Minn. 477, 479 , ).
Reliable Metal, Inc. v. Shakopee Valley Printing, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reliable Metal, Inc. v. Shakopee Valley Printing, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Friberg v. Fagen 404 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Friberg v. Fagen 404 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
68 n. 2 (Minn.1979) ("It is a well-settled principle that issues not presented at trial cannot be raised on appeal.”).
Marriage of Lamb v. Lamb 404 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lamb v. Lamb 404 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pratt Ex Rel. Pratt v. University of Minnesota Affiliated Hospitals & Clinics 403 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pratt Ex Rel. Pratt v. University of Minnesota Affiliated Hospitals & Clinics 403 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
68 n. 2 (Minn.1979) (“this court is limited to reviewing questions presented to and decided by the lower court * * *.”) Furthermore, Dr. Gorlin’s claim constitutes a factual issue, and the trial court may not grant a summary judgment where a genuine issue of fact exists.
Empire State Bank v. Devereaux 402 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Empire State Bank v. Devereaux 402 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wieneke v. Home Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roberts v. Baumgartner 391 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roberts v. Baumgartner 391 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Mottaz v. Gadbois 385 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Mottaz v. Gadbois 385 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(where there are ambiguous terms or the intent is doubtful, it is axiomatic that the contract will be construed against the drafter); see also Beattie v. Product Design & Engineering, Inc., 293 Minn. 139, 147