Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority House, 276 N.W.2d 63.

226 citing documents.

Clapp v. Haferman Water Conditioning, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Clapp v. Haferman Water Conditioning, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
What was meant by the term “non-potable” as used in the settlement agreement is decisive, for “[t]he fundamental approach to construing contracts is to allow the intent of the parties to prevail.” (citations omitted).
Benson v. City of Little Falls 379 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. City of Little Falls 379 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See, (rule that ambiguous terms be construed against the drafter does not “ineluctably lead to the conclusion that the drafter is to lose; ” other rules of construction, such as that requiring language to be given its plain and ordinary meaning, may compel a different result).
Brown v. Weeres Industries, Inc. 375 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brown v. Weeres Industries, Inc. 375 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Koecher v. Koecher 374 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Koecher v. Koecher 374 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1985
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1985
Mattila v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT CO. 363 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Mattila v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT CO. 363 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold 356 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold 356 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Because this court may not consider issues which are raised for the first time upon appeal, Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., we cannot determine at this point whether or not the appellant will be able to establish a valid factual issue regarding the respondents’ alleged malpractice.
Wilson v. Spilman 352 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wilson v. Spilman 352 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sheehy v. Bodin 349 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sheehy v. Bodin 349 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schafer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schafer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Westphal v. Anderson 347 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Westphal v. Anderson 347 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
See, Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass’n, 218 Minn. 369
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
E. g., Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499