Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Armstrong v. Mailand, 284 N.W.2d 343.

55 citing documents.

Griffiths v. Lovelette Transfer Co., Inc. 313 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1981
I. Does the “fireman’s rule” apply to police officers who are injured in the course of their duties in conducting an investigation at the scene of an automobile accident?
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
the court took an additional step by indicating in dicta that most forms of plaintiff misconduct could be compared with both a defendant’s strict products liability and a defendant’s strict liability for an abnormally dangerous activity under the comparative fault statute.
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
that the doctrine of primary assumption of risk relieves landowners of their duty of reasonable care toward firemen with respect to risks that could reasonably be anticipated as a part of firefighting.