Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co., 276 N.W.2d 77.

27 citing documents.

Nicholas Johnson and Michelle Johnson, individually and as parents and natural guardians of D.J., a minor, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., Brown v. State Auto.
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., Redeemer Covenant Church, d at 76 .
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (stating this rule).
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Continental Insurance Co. v. Bergquist 400 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Continental Insurance Co. v. Bergquist 400 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pedersen v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 383 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pedersen v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 383 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Malakowsky v. Johannsen 374 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Malakowsky v. Johannsen 374 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The dispositive case on this issue is Shannon v. Great American Insurance, *819
Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MINN. FEDERAL SAV. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. 372 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MINN. FEDERAL SAV. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. 372 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
16B J. Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice § 9090 at 579 (1981).
Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
16B J. Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice § 9090 at 579 (1981).
Alwes v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Alwes v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellant argues that the trial court improperly applied estoppel to enlarge coverage of the insurance policy
Twin City Hide v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Twin City Hide v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Furthermore, the general rule in Minnesota is that the doctrine of estoppel may not be used to enlarge an insurance contract, : The trial court was correct in its refusal to expand the coverage in excess of the stated limits of an unambiguous insurance contract.
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984