Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Howard, 324 N.W.2d 216.

56 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If a juror indicates his “intention to set aside any preconceived notions, and demonstrate[s] to the satisfaction of the trial judge that [he is] able to do so, [an appellate court] will not lightly substitute its own judgment.”
State v. Buckingham 772 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2009
State v. Buckingham 772 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2009
1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), ).
State v. Bradford 618 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 2000
State v. Bradford 618 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 2000
(quoting Edwards, 451 U.S. at 484-85 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
P. 26.02 (allowing challenge of juror for cause if the juror has a state of mind "which satisfies the court that the juror cannot try the case impartially * * *."); ("If, as here, the jurors indicate their intention to set aside any preconceived notions, and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the trial judge that they are able to do so, this court will not lightly substitute its own judgment.”).
State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
Although the “furtherance requirement” is broadly construed, cert.
State v. Lewis 547 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1996
State v. Logan 535 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1995
State v. James 520 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1994
State v. James 520 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1994
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See, (defendant talked freely after Miranda warning, requested counsel only “[n]ear the end of the * * * conversation,” when police revealed their evidence against him), cert.
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Larson 447 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Larson 447 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Forcier 420 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1988
State v. Forcier 420 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1988
verturning a conviction and granting a new trial” and holding that the record provided by the defendant on appeal did not establish that any error was prejudicial); (avoiding deciding whether statement was obtained in violation of Miranda because it was clear that any error in admitting the defendant’s statement was nonprejudicial); -23 (Minn.1982), cert.
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
State v. Howard 373 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1985
State v. Howard 373 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1985
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
State v. Lucas 372 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1985
State v. Lucas 372 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1985
State v. Montjoy 366 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1985
State v. Montjoy 366 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1985
nn.1983) (holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by evidence that the state’s chief witness, defendant’s accomplice, had been convicted by a different jury of burglary and acquitted of felony murder, even though that tipped off the jury in the defendant’s case that the other jury believed the accomplice’s version, namely that defendant killed the victim intentionally), cert.
State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985
State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985
State v. Berg 358 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Berg 358 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Appellant’s request for counsel was not the “clear, unequivocal kind of request required by Edwards * * cert.
State v. Mattson 357 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
State v. Mattson 357 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)
State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)
State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984