Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna, 295 N.W.2d 356.

50 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Abdulkadir Elmi Egal. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 356, 364 (Minn. 1980).
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
n.17 (Minn. 1980) (requiring a preliminary probable cause hearing); (requiring an attorney for a criminal defendant charged with a misdemeanor); (requiring an attorney for indigent defendants in paternity adjudicat
Drake Snell, et. al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 356, 360-61 (Minn. 1980) (applying the exception to three-day hold orders for mentally ill individuals); see also Dean , d at 5 (discussing length of hold orders in Madonna).
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Corinne MacNabb, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Zach Nubbe and Mineral Service Plus, LLC, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Doe v. Madonna , (Mi nn.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Antwone Ford, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Doe v. Madonna , 36 5 (Minn. 1980) (determining that the use of 72 -hour mental -health emergency hospitalizations orders is likely to evade review).
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(involving plaintiffs who were confined 6 for mental illness); Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of St.
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona 868 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona 868 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
(reviewing the constitutionality of three-day-hold orders for mentally ill appellants who were no longer subject to confinement at the time of their challenge).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Wayne Leonard Heinz. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Wayne Leonard Heinz. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-64 (Minn. 1980) (addressing predecessor commitment statute).
Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
Limmer v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Limmer v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
); see also Hutchinson Tech., Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue, (interpreting a statute in a manner that was inconsistent with its plain language in order to avoid the conclusion that statute violated the Commerce Clause).
State v. Gaiovnik 794 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2011
State v. Gaiovnik 794 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2011
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
In Re Robledo 611 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Robledo 611 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re McCaskill 603 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1999
In Re McCaskill 603 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1999
State v. Arens 586 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1998
State v. Arens 586 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1998
(discussing the exception).
Matter of Ayers 570 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Ayers 570 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Maloney v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Maloney v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(stating that client was subject to “hospitalization in the Hennepin County Detoxification Receiving Center”); Moeller v. Minnesota Dep’t of Transp., (stating that appellant “was again hospitalized in a detoxification center”).
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(collateral consequences presumed in criminal case); Morrissey v. State, 286 Minn. 14, 16 , (convicted person could bring postconviction petition challenging conviction even though sentence was served and his civil rights restored).
Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W. 407 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W. 407 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(court held in commitment case that a finding of “probable dangerousness,” necessary for the action taken, could be inferred from the statements in the petition for commitment and the action taken).
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: Cordie 372 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: Cordie 372 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Ward 369 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1985
State v. Ward 369 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1985
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Ringland 357 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Ringland 357 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Robledo 341 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1983
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Robledo 341 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1983
we held that due process compels a preliminary probable cause hearing at least within 72 hours of initial confinement under a hold order unless the court extends the time upon evidence demonstrating that a hearing within the time would have a serious adverse effect upon the confined patient or that o
Enberg v. Bonde 331 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1983
Enberg v. Bonde 331 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1983
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982