Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rieck, 286 N.W.2d 724.

44 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Abdulwahid Hassan Hedo, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming consecutive sentences for aggravated assault against multiple individuals inside a home because the defendant “knew, or should have known, that there would be multiple victims” in the home).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
See Gartland, d at 883; see also State v. Rieck , (focusing on the facts of the case to determine that the multiple -victim rule applied).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
If the district court concludes that the multiple-victim rule is applicable, the district court should also consider whether the imposition of multiple sentences “exaggerate[s] the criminality of [appellant’s] conduct.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
State v. Edwards 774 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2009
State v. Edwards 774 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2009
In other cases that predate the creation of the sentencing guidelines, we stated that "[w]e have adopted the rule that multiple sentences may be imposed in multiple victim cases provided the sentences do not unfairly exaggerate the criminality of the defendant's conduct.” (holding in cases involving multiple victims that "[allowing multiple sentencing ...
State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353, 360 , (quoting Stangvik); (same).
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
further supports this proposition.
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See, (affirming imposition of two sentences for defendant who fired two bullets that struck seven people in a bar); (upholding sentences for five counts of aggravated assault where defendant planted a firebomb at a house while five residents were at home).
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Nunn 411 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 411 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.F
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Mendoza, d at 288 (Minn.1980)
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press (Approved Draft, 1968) § 3.2(c))
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rieck v. State 326 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1982
Rieck v. State 326 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1982
we affirmed petitioner’s convictions but, citing Minn.Stat.
State v. Montalvo 324 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1982
State v. Montalvo 324 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1982
Watts v. State 305 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1981
Watts v. State 305 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1981
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
State v. Mendoza 297 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1980
State v. Mendoza 297 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1980
State v. Marquardt 294 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980
State v. Marquardt 294 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980