Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite O'CONNOR v. Johnson, 287 N.W.2d 400.

39 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
See O’ (noting that “[a] criminal defendant’s constitutional right to counsel .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Minn. 2020
We have repeatedly said that we have a responsibility to “safeguard for the people of Minnesota the protections embodied in our constitution.” O’
A19-0714 Minn. 2020
requested an immediate hearing “given the confidential nature of the records seized and the irreparable potential harm presented.” The motion was based primarily on our decision in O’ , and asserted that O’Connor stood for the proposition that a warrant authorizing the search of an attorney’s office is unreasonable and invalid absent a showing of criminal wrongdoing by the lawyer or a threat that the documents will be destroyed.
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
State v. Randolph 800 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2011
State v. Randolph 800 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2011
(alterations in original) (quoting O’); see also MinmStat.
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
(seizure of an underage patron in a bar); Ascher v. Comm’r of Public Safety, (sobriety checkpoint roadblock to stop motor vehicles); (seizure of person standing on street corner); Fuller, (double jeopardy clause of state constitution did not bar retrial); O’ (warrant authorizing search of attorney's office invalid under both federal and state constitutions).
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); (extending the per se concept to the Minnesota Constitution); O’ (discussing the greater protections available under the Minnesota Constitution).
State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In interpreting the *419 clauses, the Minnesota Supreme Court has referred to the “greater protections of Article I, section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution.” (citing O’).
State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
See O’ (case involving search of nonsus-pect attorney’s office for records of suspect; police should use subpoena rather than search warrant to obtain records in such circumstances).
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 492 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 492 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(since the early 1980s, the Minnesota Supreme Court has articulated a rational basis test in equal protection cases that differs from the federal standard); O’ (unlike the federal constitution, Article I, Section 10 of the state constitution requires a subpoena duces tecum when obtaining documents held by an attorney).
In Re the Welfare of D.A.G. 484 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.A.G. 484 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1992
507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)); see also O’ (discussing greater protections of article I, section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution).
State v. Davidson 471 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Davidson 471 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(religious liberties); (double jeopardy clause); , 281 n. 14 (Minn.1981) (equal protection); O’ (rights of criminally accused).
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
See, (double jeopardy clause); , 281 n. 14 (Minn.1981) (equal protection); O’ (rights of criminally accused); State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10, 21-22 , -23 (1961) (due process); Davis v. Pierse, 7 Minn. 1 , 6-7 ( Gil.
State v. Lanam 459 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1990
In Re the Investigation of the Death of VanSlooten 424 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Investigation of the Death of VanSlooten 424 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
DECISION In O’ the supreme court granted a writ of prohibition to prevent the municipal court from requiring an attorney to turn over his work product file for in camera inspection.
State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2035, 2040 , 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980) (states are free to find more expansive safeguards in their own constitutions than those conferred by the federal Constitution); O’ (Minnesota Constitution may afford Minnesota citizens greater protection against unreasonable searches and seizures than the federal Constitution).
State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
2035, 2040-41 , 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980); O’ we decline to do so in this case.
State v. Fuller 374 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1985
State v. Fuller 374 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1985
1215, 1219 , 43 L.Ed.2d 570 (1975); , 281 n. 14 (Minn.1981); O’ , 907 n. 14 (Minn.1977); State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10, 21 , -23 (1961).