Kallio v. State
Cited by
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
- State v. Carothers 594 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1999
- State v. Carothers 585 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Steinhaus 400 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Richardson 393 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1986
- State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
- State v. Frost 342 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1983
- State v. Nurmi 336 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1983
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Petitioner was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of aggravated assault (assault with a dangerous weapon) and was sentenced by the trial court to a 1-to 5-year prison term. Minn.St. 609.225, subd. 2, 609.05, 609.11. This appeal is from an order of the district court denying a petition for postconviction relief. Petitioner makes a number of contentions: (1) that the court prejudicially erred in admitting certain evidence, (2) that the trial court made a statement during closing argument which prejudiced the defense, and (3) that petitioner’s privately-retained trial counsel did not competently represent him at trial. Our examination of the record convinces us that there is no merit to any of these contentions, and we affirm. Affirmed.