Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, 293 N.W.2d 822.

121 citing documents.

USCC Services, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In Re: Henry Hickman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Underwriters, d 822, 825 (Minn. 1980).
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980); see also Meadowbrook, d at 417 & n. 15; Faber v. Roelofs, 311 Minn. 428, 433-34 , Oehme v. Johnson, 181 Minn. 138, 148-50 , 231 N.W.
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co. 806 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co. 806 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich 749 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich 749 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Underwriters, (holding that question of whether insured struck baggage clerk reflexively or intentionally during struggle over baggage should be submitted to jury for purposes of determining insurance coverage); Fanners Ins.
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Meinstma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 672 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Meinstma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 672 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Underwriters, (citing W. Prosser, The Law of Torts § 9 (4th ed.1971)).
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Underwriters, (holding that where issue of intent to injure was not necessary *406 or essential issue in previous action, it was nevertheless material fact for litigation in coverage action).
B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
Underwriters, -25 (Minn.1980) (affirming denial of summary judgment where insured struck baggage clerk after insured was injured in tug-of-war over luggage); Farmers Ins.
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Underwriters, (holding that where issue of intent to injure was not necessary or essential issue in previous action it was nevertheless material fact for litigation in coverage action).
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Underwriters, (reviewing district court’s grant of summary judgment based on its construction and interpretation of insurance policy provisions); Am.
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 605 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2000
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
& Casualty Underwriters, ), with Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Ins.
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller 589 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1999
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller 589 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1999
Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980).
Williamson v. Guentzel 584 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Williamson v. Guentzel 584 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 574 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1998
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd 547 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1996
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd 547 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1996
Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980).
Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 545 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
& Casualty Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980) (when allegations in complaint were broad enough to include claim arguably within terms of policy coverage, insurer had duty to defend).
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
& Casualty Underwriters, (intent not inferred as a matter of law where insured punched victim during argument).
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980)).
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Rohrer v. Rick 529 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
& Casualty Underwriters, (resolution of issue in prior action must have been "necessary and essential" to preclude relitigation).
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 520 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 520 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980) (when allegations in complaint were broad enough to include claim arguably within terms of policy coverage, insurer had duty to defend).
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
& Casualty Underwriters, -26 (Minn.1980) (the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify).
Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by