Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Powderly v. Erickson, 285 N.W.2d 84.

25 citing documents.

Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. 2025
Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. 2025
Pratt v. State, Dep’t of Nat.
Eric Ringsred, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State by Archabal v. County of Hennepin , ().
Eric Ringsred, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State by Powderly v. Erickson
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Minn. 2020
This burden shifting runs contrary to Minnesota law, which places the burden “on the person challenging the government’s action to establish that there is an unconstitutional taking.” (internal citations omitted).
Friends of Tower Hill Park, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State by Archabal v. County of Hennepin
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
See, e.g., Wes tling, d at 823-24 ; Zeman, d at 552 ; Pratt v. State Dep’t of Natural Res.
State Ex Rel. Fort Snelling State Park Ass'n v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board 673 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Fort Snelling State Park Ass'n v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board 673 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
See, e.g., Archabal, d at 421-22; Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, -88 (Minn.1979); PEER, d at 867-68 .
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
Historical resources are not defined within MERA; however, we identified certain factors that should be taken into account in determining whether a building falls under the protection of MERA, looking principally to the criteria used to determine what buildings are included on the National Register of Historic Places: The quality of significance in American histo
Stenger v. State 449 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Stenger v. State 449 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Larson v. County of Washington 387 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. County of Washington 387 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Accord State, (burden of proof *908 is on the person challenging the governmental action to establish that the property has been deprived of all reasonable uses); Carl Bolander & Sons, pet.
State Ex Rel. Powderly v. Erickson 301 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1981
State Ex Rel. Powderly v. Erickson 301 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1981
In the first appeal, State, this court found that the row houses were an historical resource within the meaning of the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), Minn.Stat.
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
2 State, by Powderly, v. Erickson, Beck v. City of St.