Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pieschke, 295 N.W.2d 580.

280 citing documents.

State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Livingston 420 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Livingston 420 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Regarding the inconsistencies, : “Even inconsistencies in the state’s case will not require the reversal of the jury verdict.” Respondent argues that the evidence supports a finding of intent on each count.
State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Boyd 410 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Boyd 410 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Gonzalez 407 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Gonzalez 407 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Clayborne 404 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Clayborne 404 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of West St. Paul v. Smith 404 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of West St. Paul v. Smith 404 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. LaFrance, 302 Minn. 245, 246 , Minn.R.Crim.P.
State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Moot 398 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Moot 398 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Crego 395 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Crego 395 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Beehler v. State 393 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Beehler v. State 393 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Griffin 386 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Griffin 386 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Doughman 384 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1986
State v. Doughman 384 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1986
State v. Hanson 382 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hanson 382 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[Wjeighing the credibility of witnesses is the exclusive function of the jury.”
State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Miller 374 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Miller 374 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Garcia 374 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Garcia 374 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Where the case hinges upon conflicting testimony, “weighing the credibility of the witnesses is the exclusive function of the jury.” ().
State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Spanyard 358 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by