Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pieschke, 295 N.W.2d 580.
-
State v. Spanyard
358 N.W.2d 125
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Given that the function of the factfinder is to weigh the credibility of witnesses, the record supports the trial court’s finding that Spanyard violated the terms of her probation.
-
STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson
358 N.W.2d 127
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Ronnenberg, 214 Minn. 272, 273
- State v. Winship 355 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Winship 355 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- City of Minneapolis v. Larsen 354 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
City of Minneapolis v. Larsen
354 N.W.2d 82
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The jury is in the best position to evaluate conflicting testimony, it could reasonably conclude appellant was guilty of more than merely arguing with a police officer and that her actions and words constituted disorderly conduct.
- State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Tiessen 354 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. St. Cyr 354 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. St. Cyr
354 N.W.2d 479
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-452 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
-
State v. Tiessen
354 N.W.2d 473
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-452 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
- State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Thomas
352 N.W.2d 526
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“[0]n review of a criminal conviction we will construe the record most favorably to the state and will assume the evidence supporting the conviction was believed and the contrary evidence disbelieved.”
- State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- In Re the Welfare of T.J.D. 351 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- In Re the Welfare of T.J.D. 351 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Green 351 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Green
351 N.W.2d 42
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See generally, State v. Moseng, 254 Minn. 263
- State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Nunn
351 N.W.2d 16
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although the jury is entitled to disbelieve the appellant’s testimony, it is also true that a defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.
- Pan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 347 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Pan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 347 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Heinzer 347 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Heinzer 347 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
- State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984