Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Bloomington v. Local 2828 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal…, 290 N.W.2d 598.

29 citing documents.

Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Minn. 2023
2828, AFSCME, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Itasca County, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quoting City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, AFSCME , ).
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Fed’n of State, County & Municipal Emp’es, see also David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Const., Inc., (explaining that such power is “implicit in the exceedingly broad powers which were granted by the parties” in a broadly worded arbitration agreement).
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The role of the reviewing • court is “solely to determine whether specific language in the [CBA] or submission precludes the arbitrator from deciding the case as he did.” City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, AFSCME
City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Followed City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, (holding that courts may not overturn an arbitration award merely because they disagree with the decision on the merits).
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828
County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
See City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, AFSCME, (“The proper role of judicial review in arbitration cases is solely to determine whether specific language in the agreement or submission precludes the arbitrator from deciding the case as he did.”).
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 504 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1993
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 504 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1993
In this case, by failing to define specifically what acts constitute just cause for discharge, the parties left this decision to an arbitrator, and the role of this court in such cases is “solely to determine whether specific language in the agreement or submission precludes [the arbitrator’s decision].” City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, AFSCME
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 493 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 493 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828
David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. 428 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. 428 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828
Independent School District No. 51 v. School Service Employees Union Local 284 428 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Independent School District No. 51 v. School Service Employees Union Local 284 428 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees
In re Grievance Arbitration between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local No. 19 414 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re Grievance Arbitration between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local No. 19 414 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828 of American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees
Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1987
Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1987
AFSCME Council 65, Local Union No. 667, Aitkin County Courthouse Employees v. Aitkin County 357 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
AFSCME Council 65, Local Union No. 667, Aitkin County Courthouse Employees v. Aitkin County 357 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“[C]ourts will not overturn an award merely because they may disagree with the arbitrators’ decision on the merits.” City of Bloomington v. Local 2828, AFSCME, (quoting Children’s Hospital, ).
State Ex Rel. Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320 316 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1982
State Ex Rel. Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320 316 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1982
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees
Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8 309 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1981