Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Garner, 294 N.W.2d 725.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    confession.” See Williams, d at 288 (concluding that officer did not engage in coercive tactics when appellant was held in detention cell for over six hours, detective hypothesized about what type of physical evidence might be discovered, called appellant a liar, and without a factual basis, told appellant that one of the surviving victims could identify him); (holding that confession elicited from an intoxicated accused who had been intentionally lied to, threatened with excess criminal charges
  • State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
    -27 (Minn.1980), we concluded that the intoxicated defendant was susceptible to the admitted police tactics of combining “stress-inducing techniques” with “trickery and deceit” to “frighten defendants into giving incriminating statements.” Thus, we look at the totality of the circumstances to determine if a statem
  • State v. Marshall 642 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Marshall 642 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Sirvio 579 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Sirvio 579 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
    515, 520 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986), stating that “all” the involuntariness cases “have contained a substantial element of coercive police conduct.”
  • State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
    in which the court held that where the interrogating officer intentionally lied 4 to the defendant, put stress on him by threatening to charge him with as many crimes as possible and physically intimidated him, the confession should have been suppressed.
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
    at 2418 ; -28 (Minn.1980).
  • State v. CJM 409 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. C.J.M. 409 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. CJM 409 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    an interrogating officer used FBI stress-inducing techniques, such as violating defendant's body space, coupled with trickery and deceit to frighten defendant into giving incriminating statements.
  • State v. C.J.M. 409 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    an interrogating officer used FBI stress-inducing techniques, such as violating defendant’s body space, coupled with trickery and deceit to frighten defendant into giving incriminating statements.
  • State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (officer admitted using techniques coupled with trickery and deceit to frighten defendants into confessing).
  • State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Courts have focused on numerous factors when examining the circumstances of a confession, including: (1) the defendant’s age, experience, and mental capacity, (2) the use of stress creating techniques, (3) the length and conditions of the confinement or interrogation, Haynes v. Washington, 373 U.S. 503 , 83 S.Ct.
  • State v. Anderson 298 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Anderson 298 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1980
    2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978)