Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604.

195 citing documents.

Clear Channel Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 675 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State, Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board v. Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party 671 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State, Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board v. Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party 671 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of Hanover 667 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of Hanover 667 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 667 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2003
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Frank’s Nursery Sales, -09 (Minn.1980).
Stanton v. Mazda 2001 VIN 4F2YU08121KM57063, Plate No. GLE 228(MN) 660 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Stanton v. Mazda 2001 VIN 4F2YU08121KM57063, Plate No. GLE 228(MN) 660 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
SLS P’ Frank’s Nursery Sales, -09 (Minn.1980).
American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant 636 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 2001
American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant 636 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 2001
Alcozer v. North Country Food Bank 635 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Sunrise Lake Ass'n v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sunrise Lake Ass'n v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Buss v. Johnson 624 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Buss v. Johnson 624 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ass’n v. Public Employment Relations Bd., (statutes); Frank’s Nursery Sales, (ordinances).
My Brother's Keeper v. Scott County 621 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
My Brother's Keeper v. Scott County 621 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Frank’s Nursery Sales, -09 (Minn.1980).
American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl 616 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 2000
American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl 616 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 2000
Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
Basic rules of statutory construction instruct that words and phrases are to be construed according to their plain and ordinary meaning, see Frank’s Nursery Sales, and the language of criminal statutes is to be strictly construed
R.L. Hexum & Associates, Inc. v. Rochester Township, Board of Supervisors 609 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
R.L. Hexum & Associates, Inc. v. Rochester Township, Board of Supervisors 609 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Frank’s Nursery Sales, (holding that opinions of governmental authority on legal questions, while entitled to consideration, are not as persuasive as they would be on questions of fact).
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission 601 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission 601 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Frank’s (“[T]he interpretation of zoning ordinances is a question of law that we must review independently.”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
at 743 (quoting Frank’s Nursery Sales, ).
Wedemeyer v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wedemeyer v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Frank’s Nursery Sales, -09 (Minn.1980); Medical Servs.
SLS PARTNERSHIP v. City of Apple Valley 511 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1994
SLS PARTNERSHIP v. City of Apple Valley 511 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1994
2 The principles for the interpretation and application of an ordinance were definitively set out by this court in Frank’s Nursery Sales
State v. Nelson 499 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Nelson 499 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Frank’s Nursery Sales, see also Farmington Tp.
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by