Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604.

195 citing documents.

Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Medical Services, Inc. v. City of Savage 487 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Medical Services, Inc. v. City of Savage 487 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
County of Isanti v. Peterson 469 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
County of Isanti v. Peterson 469 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State Ex Rel. Minneapolis Park Lovers v. City of Minneapolis 468 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State Ex Rel. Minneapolis Park Lovers v. City of Minneapolis 468 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Farmington Township v. High Plains Cooperative 460 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Farmington Township v. High Plains Cooperative 460 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re the Appeal of Brine 457 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re the Appeal of Brine 457 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“The law in Minnesota is clear that administration of zoning ordinances is a governmental not a proprietary function * * Frank’s Nursery Sales
County of Lake v. Courtney 451 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
County of Lake v. Courtney 451 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Tuckner v. Township of May 419 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Tuckner v. Township of May 419 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
While zoning ordinances should be construed strictly against the county and in favor of the property owner, Frank’s the ordinance must always be considered in light of its underlying policy.
Potts v. City of Hugo 416 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Potts v. City of Hugo 416 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
*468 Frank’s (citations omitted).
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2 Just five weeks after deciding Ridgewood, the supreme court decided Frank’s Nursery Sales
Castle Design & Development Co. v. City of Lake Elmo 396 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Castle Design & Development Co. v. City of Lake Elmo 396 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frank’s see also Prior Lake Aggregates, (city cannot be bound to issue special use permit by prior erroneous application of zoning ordinance).
Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education 376 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education 376 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Oswalt v. County of Ramsey 371 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Oswalt v. County of Ramsey 371 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 350 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1984
Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 350 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1984
Prior Lake Aggregates, Inc. v. City of Savage 349 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Prior Lake Aggregates, Inc. v. City of Savage 349 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“[Wjhere a municipality acts in its factfinding or legislative policymaking capacity under its delegated powers the scope of review is very narrow, ‘subject only to the broad limits of the “arbitrary and capricious” standard * * V ” (quoting Frank’s Nursery Sales, ).
Odell v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Odell v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1984
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1984
The general rule in Minnesota is that where a municipality acts in its fact-finding or legislative policymaking capacity under its delegated powers the scope of review is very narrow, “subject only to the broad limits of the 'arbitrary and capricious’ standard * * *.” Frank’s Nursery Sales
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen 342 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1984
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen 342 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1984
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
Western Area Business & Civic Club v. Duluth School Board Independent District No. 709 324 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1982
Western Area Business & Civic Club v. Duluth School Board Independent District No. 709 324 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1982
§ 645.08(1) (1980); Frank’s
Batalden v. County of Goodhue 308 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1981
Batalden v. County of Goodhue 308 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1981