Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Chosa, 290 N.W.2d 766.

166 citing documents.

Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(evidence of unfitness as a parent must address conditions at the time of hearing); (same).
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The evidence relating to the termination “must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing * * * [and] it must appear that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.”
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The Minnesota Supreme Court has construed the statute to require that the evidence relating to the termination must address conditions as they “exist at the time of the hearing,” and it must appear that the conditions of neglect “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.”
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
§ 260.221(b)(5) (1986); d at 541-42
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing).
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In addition, the supreme court has construed the statute to require “that the evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing,” and “that it must appear that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.”
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In addition, the Minnesota Supreme Court has construed the statute tó require “that the evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing,” and “that it must appear that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.”
In Re the Welfare of J.L.L. 396 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.L.L. 396 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.L.W. 395 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.L.W. 395 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of C.D. 393 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of C.D. 393 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V. 392 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re K.M.T. 390 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of KMT 390 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re K.M.T. 390 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of KMT 390 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of T.M.D. 374 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of T.M.D. 374 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
As the Minnesota Supreme Court said in “[w]e further require that the evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing.” We are also aware that numerous witnesses testified that appellant’s present treatment of M.D.
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of Clough 369 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of Clough 369 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The burden is upon the petitioner to prove that termination is proper and is “subject to the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child.”
In Re the Welfare of T.J.J. 366 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of T.J.J. 366 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984