Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Chosa, 290 N.W.2d 766.

166 citing documents.

Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of L.J.B. 356 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of L.J.B. 356 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The burden is upon the petitioner to prove that termination is proper, and that burden is “subject to the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child.”
Matter of Welfare of Maas 355 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of Maas 355 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter .of Welfare of Chosa
Matter of Welfare of Udstuen 349 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of Udstuen 349 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of RMM 316 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1982
In re the Welfare of R. M. M. 316 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1982
In re the Welfare of R. M. M. 316 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1982
In addition to requiring that the trial court make clear and specific findings which conform to the statutory require *542 ments, we further require that the evidence relating to termination address conditions which exist at the time of the hearing and that it appear that “the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period * *
Matter of RMM 316 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1982
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
On this record we cannot conclude that the trial court’s findings comply with the stringent standards recently summarized in In

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by