Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of HGB, 306 N.W.2d 821.

99 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
*648 However, parents’ right to custody exists “only so long as they shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations.”
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Trial courts should not permit termination “except for grave and weighty reasons.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The cause for a trial court’s termination of parental rights must be “grave and weighty.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V. 392 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
-27 (Minn.1981); (termination of parental rights under Minn. Stat. § 260.221 (b)(7); (voluntary termination of parental rights).
In Re the Welfare of P.L.C. 384 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of P.L.C. 384 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(“grave and weighty reasons” required for termination).
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Generally, the cause for termination of parental rights must be “grave and weighty.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of Clough 369 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of Clough 369 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In deciding whether to terminate parental rights, the interests of the parent and the child are to be considered “along with the circumstances of the particular case in an effort to determine which of these interests is to predominate.” In re Welfare of *342 HGB, MAB and DJB
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 369 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 369 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1985
Although parents’ right to custody of their children should not be taken from them but for “grave and weighty reasons,” the law secures parents’ right to custody “only so long as they shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations.”
In Re the Welfare of T.J.J. 366 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of T.J.J. 366 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
§ 1912 (f); (the child’s best interests are balanced with a parent’s interests when applying § 260.221(b)(7)).
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Klugman, 256 Minn. at 119, 124, d at 429, 432; and -27 (Minn.1981).
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(d)Best interests of the child The trial court noted in its conclusions of law that termination of the appellant’s parental rights “would be in the child’s best interests.” notes that interests of the child should be a factor to be weighed in termination proceedings.
Matter of Welfare of Udstuen 349 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of Udstuen 349 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of K.T. 327 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
In Re the Welfare of K.T. 327 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
In re the Welfare of McDonald 316 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
In re the Welfare of McDonald 316 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
It is our view that the great weight of the evidence supports the trial court’s determination that these statutory grounds for the termination of parental rights existed in this matter and, in light of the fact that the court is also permitted to consider the best interests of the child, the order for termination must be affirmed.
In Re the Welfare of C.L.L. 310 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1981
In Re the Welfare of C.L.L. 310 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1981

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by