Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of HGB, 306 N.W.2d 821.

99 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. H. M., O. J. T., L. A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION Parental rights should be terminated only “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
11 481 (1972)); (“It is settled that the nature of due process is flexibility.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. H., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION Parental rights should be terminated only “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. U. M. and R. E. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
DECISION Parental rights should be terminated only “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. D. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court should only terminate parental rights “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. B.-H. L. and W. A. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. W. and C. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. Y., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Safety, (quoting Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 481 (1972)); In re Welfare of HGB , (“It is settled that the nature of due process is flexibility.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S.L.W. and J.H.O., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Parental rights should only be terminated “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H.-M. E. R. and R. N. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
9 DECISION Parental rights should be terminated only “for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. S. and D. M. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Parental rights should only be terminated “for grave and weighty reasons.”
A20-1351 Minn. 2021
& H.W., (stating that the “authority to regulate the procedures governing judicial proceedings is an inherent judicial power”); (explaining that the “process due varies with the circumstances of the case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. S. and J. L. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
XIV, § 1; Minn. Const. art. I, § 7
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. J. O., J. E. J., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Parental rights should not be terminated “except for grave and weighty reasons.” (Mi nn.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. H. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
to the custody and companionship of their children.”
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. D. and J. M. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N Parental rights should not be terminated “except for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. A. L., N. P. C., and M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Therefore, parental rights should not be terminated “except for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K.H. and D.C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
does not challenge any other aspect of the district court’s ruling.2 Fundamentally, parental rights should not be terminated “except for grave and weighty reasons.”
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.E.M. and J.M.M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The amount of process due varies with the circumstances of the case.’” In re Welfare of Children of Coats , ().
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. S. and A. M. A., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Parental rights should not be terminated “except for grave and weighty reasons.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. P., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Caleb Wesen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing Cafeteria & Rest.
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of the Child of B.J.-M. 744 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2008
In Re Bj-M. 744 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2008
In re the Welfare of the Child of B.J.-M. 744 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2008
Although the amount of process due in a particular case varies with the unique circumstances of that case, prejudice as a result of the alleged violation is an essential component of the due process analysis, see Bendorf v. Comm’r of Pub.
In Re Bj-M. 744 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2008
Although the amount of process due in a particular case varies with the unique circumstances of that case, prejudice as a result of the alleged violation is an essential component of the due process analysis, see Bendorf v. Comm'r of Pub.
Soohoo v. Johnson 731 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2007
Soohoo v. Johnson 731 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2007
We have also observed that parents have a fundamental right to the care, custody, and control of their children that should not be interfered with except for “ ‘grave and weighty reasons.’ ” ().
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Heidbreder v. Carton 636 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Heidbreder v. Carton 636 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating that “[t]he law secures their parental right only so long as [parents] shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations.”) (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats 633 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2001
Halverson Ex Rel. Halverson v. Taflin 617 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Halverson Ex Rel. Halverson v. Taflin 617 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(recognizing the longstanding fundamental right of parents to their child’s companionship).
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H. 604 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H. 604 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of A.J.C. 556 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.J.C. 556 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995