Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Minnetonka v. Carlson, 298 N.W.2d 763.

64 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. David J. Schaffer, Below, ... 8 N.W.3d 220 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. David J. Schaffer, Below, ... 8 N.W.3d 220 Minn. 2024
e the consideration of the fee agreement existing between counsel and the client, which is one factor to be considered in determining the reasonable hourly rate that is used to calculate the lodestar amount.”); see also Paulson, d at 426 (holding that fee agreements are not the controlling factor in calculating attorney fees under Minn. Stat. § 117.16); (affirming the district court’s fee award under Minn. Stat. § 117.195 because it did not prioritize the contingent fee agreement over the other
Kristie Kollmann, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(noting a district court sitting without a jury “is the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and may accept all or only part of any witness’ testimony”).
Faricy Law Firm, PA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 659-60; see also Green v. BMW of N. Am., LLC , (describing six factors as “relevant circumstances” in lodestar analysis); City of Minnetonka v. Carlson , 765 n.1 (Minn. 1980) (relying on six factors to determine reasonable value of legal services); -26 (Minn. 1971) (listing six factors to consider when determining reasonable value of legal services); see also Minn. R. Gen.
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
See City of Minnetonka v.Carlson , , 765, 765 n.1 (Minn. 1980) (interpreting Minn. Stat § 117.195 (1976), which provided that "[w]hen the proceeding [for condemnation] is so dismissed or the same is discontinued by the petitioner, the owner may recover from the petitioner reasonable costs and expenses including attorneys' fees"); State by Head v. Pauls
Menard, Inc., Relator v. County of Clay 886 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2016
Menard, Inc., Relator v. County of Clay 886 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2016
The tax court is free to “accept all or only part of any witness’ testimony.”
State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mead 691 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mead 691 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
This was presumably done in an effort to challenge the Doubravas’ projected attorney fees under the proposed settlement as “unreasonable.” -67 (Minn.1980) (articulating factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees).
City of Minneapolis v. Fisher 504 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of Minneapolis v. Fisher 504 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of Hennepin 482 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1992
Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of Hennepin 482 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1992
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. County of Hennepin 450 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1990
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. County of Hennepin 450 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1990
Beebout v. Beebout 447 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Beebout v. Beebout 447 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Miller v. Hennen 438 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1989
Miller v. Hennen 438 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1989
On review of such a judgment, an appellate court may reverse a finding of fact if, upon a review of the entire record, the appellate court is left with a “firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center Partnership 428 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center Partnership 428 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Stealy v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Stealy v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Crown Holding Corp. v. Larson 410 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Crown Holding Corp. v. Larson 410 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The parties’ intent turns on the issue of credibility, and the trial court is the “sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and may accept all or only part of any witness’ testimony.”
Gjovik v. Strope 401 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1987
Gjovik v. Strope 401 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1987
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co. 400 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co. 400 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kadrlik v. Commissioner of Public Safety 388 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kadrlik v. Commissioner of Public Safety 388 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Munoz 385 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Munoz 385 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
52.01; (reviewing court will reverse a trial court’s findings only if, on review of the entire record, it is left with a firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been made); State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Peterson 379 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Peterson 379 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
See, (scope of review for questions of fact determined by a trial court); (scope of review for questions of fact determined by a jury).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by