Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854.

348 citing documents.

State v. Hanson 468 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Hanson 468 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hanson then waived his right to a jury trial, and stipulated to the facts as stated in the complaint, to expedite appellate review.
State v. Masloski 430 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Masloski 430 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(defendant may seek expedited review by stipulating to the facts and appealing from any conviction after trial to the court).
State v. Pendleton 427 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Pendleton 427 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Johnson 422 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Johnson 422 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
a defendant entered a “conditional guilty plea” by pleading guilty and expressly reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence on constitutional grounds.
State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Rupprecht 381 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Rupprecht 381 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
Melvin and Gordon both stipulated to the evidence against them and were found guilty of the charges.
State v. Kager 357 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Kager 357 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Beckman 354 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1984
State v. Beckman 354 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1984
State v. Jungbauer 348 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
State v. Jungbauer 348 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
This procedure, -58 (Minn.1980), preserved defendant's right to raise the confession issue on appeal without putting the state and himself through the time and expense of a full trial.
State v. Faber 343 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1984
State v. Faber 343 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1984
the Rules of Criminal Procedure do not recognize the conditional guilty plea.
Wensman v. State 342 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1984
Wensman v. State 342 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1984
State v. Koziol 338 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1983
State v. Koziol 338 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1983
State v. Mallory 337 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1983
State v. Mallory 337 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1983
State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
we approved the use of the stipulation technique as a means of expediting the determination of guilt without waiving constitutional claims.
State v. Hunner 328 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1983
State v. Hunner 328 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1983
we approved the use of the stipulation technique as a means of expediting the determination of guilt without waiving constitutional claims.
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
The case was lost by defendant at the pretrial suppression hearing; thus the use of the stipulation procedure
State v. Liljedahl 327 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
State v. Liljedahl 327 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982
State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982
State v. Braasch 316 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1982
State v. Braasch 316 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1982
we approved use of the stipulation procedure as a means of avoiding the time and expense of trial while at the same time preserving fourth amendment evidentiary issues for appeal.
State v. Miller 316 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1982
State v. Miller 316 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1982