DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854.

348 citing documents.

  • State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
    preserving respondent’s right to appeal the trial court’s pre-trial order denying the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    Following the omnibus ruling
  • State v. Verschelde 585 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Verschelde 585 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    Verschelde then agreed to stipulate to the state’s case and waive a in order to expedite appellate review of the district court’s ruling.
  • State v. Slette 585 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Slette 585 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    See State v. Lothenbach (defendant wishing to preserve constitutional issue for appeal may waive right to jury trial then stipulate to prosecution’s case).
  • State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    The court also found that the gun and the statements Hendrickson made after receiving a Miranda warning were not the “fruit of a poisonous tree.” Hendrickson waived his right to a jury trial, to preserve the omnibus issues for appellate review.
  • State v. Bowen 560 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Bowen 560 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    (procedure for expediting appellate review of pretrial issues).
  • State v. George 557 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1997
  • State v. George 557 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
    Paul then waived his right to a jury trial, entered a and appealed the denial of this motion to suppress evidence on constitutional grounds to the court of appeals, which affirmed.
  • State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
    At the conclusion of the omnibus hearing, the district court denied the respondent’s motion to suppress his statements to his father, finding that “[n]o Miranda [w]aming was required, and the defendant’s constitutional rights against self-incrimination were not violated.” On November 1, 1993, in a the state dismissed the theft charge, and the parties submitted the charge of receiving stolen property to the court.
  • State v. Paul 536 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Paul 536 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Paul then waived his right to a jury trial, entered a and brought this appeal.
  • State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    After the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence, appellant Neil Hjelmstad waived his right to a jury trial and entered a based on police reports and the transcript from an Omnibus hearing.
  • State v. Cripps 533 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Cripps 533 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Miller 525 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Pfannenstein 525 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Miller 525 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Pfannenstein 525 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Pfannenstein then waived his right to a jury trial and, to expedite appellate review of the suppression issue, stipulated to the state’s
  • State v. Christiansen 515 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Christiansen 515 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Christiansen then waived a
  • State v. Balduc 514 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Balduc 514 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Hulst 510 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Hulst 510 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    appellant pleaded guilty and admitted that: (1) he had been driving; (2) he refused to provide a sample of his breath or blood for chemical testing; and (3) the copy of his Iowa driving record, which shows prior out-of-state license revocations, correctly represents his driving record.
  • State v. Lembke 509 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Lembke 509 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    After appellant Dwight Lembke’s motion to suppress was denied, he stipulated to the state’s case and waived a
  • State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    (procedure for expediting appellate review of suppression issue).
  • State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. White 493 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. White 493 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    (method for expediting appellate review of suppression rulings).
  • State v. Larson 485 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Larson 485 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Larson stipulated to the facts under State v. Loth- *572 enbach, -58 (Minn. 1980), was found guilty by the court and sentenced.
  • State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    -58 (Minn.1980) (meth *430 od of expediting appellate review).
  • State v. Jensen 482 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Jensen 482 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    To obtain appellate review, Jensen pleaded not guilty, waived a jury trial, and stipulated to the state’s
  • State v. Halla-Poe 468 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Halla-Poe 468 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    Subsequently, appellant pled not guilty, waived her right to a jury trial, and stipulated to the prosecution’s (procedure often employed in prosecutions where the defendant’s only viable defense may be the suppression of the evidence on fourth amendment grounds.