Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. State, 310 N.W.2d 487.

34 citing documents.

Jade Joseph Nickels, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mary Kate Nguyen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
Cameron Court Homeowners Association v. Ngozichukwa Akubuike Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cameron Court Homeowners Association v. Ngozichukwa Akubuike Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State 713 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2006
Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State 713 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2006
we defined a bill of attainder as a statute that “specifically singles out an identifiable group or individual for the infliction of punishment by other than judicial authority.” Appellants argue the statute is a bill of attainder because it “applies only to designated entities,” presumably appellant
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
ANALYSIS When reviewing a bench trial, we are limited to determining whether the trial court’s findings are “clearly erroneous, either without substantial evidentiary support or induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Western Insulation Services, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 460 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Western Insulation Services, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 460 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Warthan v. Midwest Consolidated Insurance Agencies, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Warthan v. Midwest Consolidated Insurance Agencies, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Regents of University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 405 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Regents of University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 405 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of St. Paul v. Nelson 404 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of St. Paul v. Nelson 404 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schmidtbauer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schmidtbauer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
STATE BY SPANNAUS v. Belmont, Holmberg 384 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
STATE BY SPANNAUS v. Belmont, Holmberg 384 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citation omitted); see Bohm v. Independent School Dist.
Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 360 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 360 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
an inquiry into the legislature’s motives is not usually proper, but an examination of the materials that constitute legislative history is permissible if the purpose is simply to determine what the legislature intended by the language it used.
Pickands Mather & Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 334 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1983
Pickands Mather & Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 334 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1983
we *158 noted that the Taconite Amendment created a contract between the taconite producers and the State of Minnesota and observed that “[w]hen the people of this state make a bargain, mining companies as well as the least of us have a right to expect that the bargain will be kept.” It is Erie’s con
State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982