Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Boley, 299 N.W.2d 924.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(listing cases); -26 (Minn. 1980) (same).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g., State v. Gibson , -98 (Minn. 1991) (vacating sentence for l eaving the scene of an accident where defendant immediately left the scene in order to avoid apprehension for criminal vehicular operation); (holding that escape from 19 custody sentence should be vacated where defendant fled police officer to avoid apprehension for burglary and the offenses occurred within minutes of one another).
Distinguished State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“In a series of decisions —the avoidance-of-apprehension cases—we have held that multiple sentences may not be used for two offenses if the defendant, substantially contemporaneously committed the second offense in order to avoid apprehension for the first offense.”); -26 (Minn. 1980).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that offenses that occurred in the same general area and within minutes of each other arose from the same behavioral incident); see also State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520, 522, (noting 6 that offenses that occurred within five minutes and three miles of each other
State of Minnesota v. Hugh Alexander Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Hugh Alexander Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
to ascertain which offense is the most serious, leaving the longest sentence in place.” ( ).
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Multiple punishment[s] refers not to multiple convictions but multiple sentences and any multiple sentences, including concurrent sentences, are barred if section 609.035 applies.”
State v. Kebaso 713 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2006
State v. Kebaso 713 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2006
See, e.g., Norregaard, d at 450
State v. Brown 597 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Brown 597 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
Multiple punishment “refers not to multiple convictions but multiple sentences and any multiple sentences, including concurrent sentences, are barred if section 609.035 applies.”
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. Anderson 468 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Anderson 468 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
requires a contrary result.
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
§ 609.035 "refers not to multiple convictions but multiple sentences and any multiple sentences, including concurrent sentences, are barred if Section 609.035 applies.” ().
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
He relies on the so-called avoidance-of-apprehension eases, which include, in addition to the Finn case
State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
Thus, Finn and analogous cases, see, apply and bar the multiple sentencing.
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
Relevant cases deciding whether or not two or more convictions were committed during a
City of Fergus Falls v. Sporre 300 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1981
City of Fergus Falls v. Sporre 300 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1981
filed November 21,1980; State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , and State v. Corning, 289 Minn. 382