Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rice v. Perl, 320 N.W.2d 407.

108 citing documents.

Lewis v. St. Cloud State University 693 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Lewis v. St. Cloud State University 693 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
An attorney-client relationship gives rise to fiduciary duties: “The attorney is under a duty to represent the client with undivided loyalty, to preserve the client’s confidences, and to disclose any material matters bearing upon the representation of these obligations.” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Ronald E. Mallen & Victor B. Levit, Legal Malpractice § 121 (2d ed.1981)).
Beehner v. Cragun Corp. 636 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Beehner v. Cragun Corp. 636 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gradjelick v. Hance 627 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gradjelick v. Hance 627 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In determining whether to grant a continuance for further discovery, we should consider whether the party seeking the continuance has been “diligent in obtaining or seeking discovery prior to its Rule 56.06 motion” and whether the party is acting in the good faith belief that material facts will be uncovered, and not just “engaging in a fishing expedition.”
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
D.A.B. v. Brown 570 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
D.A.B. v. Brown 570 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 566 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 566 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Holmes v. Winners Entertainment, Inc. 531 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Holmes v. Winners Entertainment, Inc. 531 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The trial court has “great discretion to determine the procedural calendar of a case”; the court should be strict in refusing a continuance when discovery would merely be a “fishing expedition.”
Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd. 529 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd. 529 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(further discovery is appropriate when party has good faith belief that material facts will be uncovered but not when party merely hopes to uncover material facts).
Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE 527 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE 527 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
56.06, 1 the court has “great discretion” to determine the procedural calendar of a case, and “continuances should be liberally granted.”
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Shaughnessy 519 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Shaughnessy 519 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-13 (Minn.1982); see also Minn.R.Civ.P.
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(compensation may be denied even if it cannot be proven that the fraud was intentional).
Padco, Inc. v. Kinney & Lange 444 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Padco, Inc. v. Kinney & Lange 444 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing R. Mallen and V. Levit, Legal Malpractice, § 121 at 208 (2d ed. 1981) and Baker v. Humphrey, 101 U.S. 494, 501 , 25 L.Ed.
Trenti, Saxhaug, Berger, Roche, Stephenson, Richards & Aluni, Ltd. v. Nartnik 439 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Trenti, Saxhaug, Berger, Roche, Stephenson, Richards & Aluni, Ltd. v. Nartnik 439 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
the Trenti firm is required to forfeit all fees for work performed on the personal injury claim and on the misdemeanor defense.
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg 426 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg 426 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(citing 10 C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2741 at 733-734 (1973)).
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Perl 415 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1987
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Perl 415 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1987
Kissner v. Norton 412 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kissner v. Norton 412 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Penney Co., Inc., , 216-17 (Minn.1985) ().
Kasson State Bank v. Haugen 410 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kasson State Bank v. Haugen 410 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of New Hope, (all courts provide some latitude and consideration to pro se litigants); (continuances for discovery should be liberally granted to diligent parties acting in good faith).
Matter of Discipline of Perl 407 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Perl 407 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1987
While Browne had been paid substantial FELA consulting fees, the referee found “it was not shown that Browne was paid any amounts by Perl for settling Dal-kon Shield cases” and that “[i]t also does not appear that the clients were prejudiced in these settlements.” As a the trial court further found that Perl has had to repay large sums to clients in forfeiture of his fees earned on the Dai-kon Shield eases.
Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
Upon this background, in 1982 (Perl I), which was our first decision to consider the matter of Perl and his Dai-kon Shield clients.
Browne v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 377 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Browne v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 377 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hasan v. McDonald's Corp. 377 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hasan v. McDonald's Corp. 377 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 376 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1985
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 376 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1985
accord 10A C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2741 (1983).