Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rice v. Perl, 320 N.W.2d 407.
- Joe Schafer, et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of Minor W.S., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
A25-0147
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But district courts have “great discretion to determine the procedural calendar of a case.”
-
Landmark Community Bank, N.A., now doing business as Flagship Bank Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The district court has wide discretion in granting or denying discovery requests, Rice v. Perl , (Mi nn.
-
Steven Lee Mittelstaedt, et al.,
Minn. 2022
The standard of conduct obligates the attorney to “represent the client with undivided loyalty, to preserve the client’s confidences, and to disclose any material matters bearing upon the representation of those matters.” (citation omitted).
-
Jay A. Soeffker, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An attorney owes a fiduciary duty “to represent the client with undivided loyalty, to preserve the client ’s confidences, and to disclose any material matters bearing upon the represen tation of these obligations.” d 407, 410 (Minn. 1982) (emphasis omitted) (q uotation omitted).
- Calm Waters, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Shamrock Sod & Landscaping, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- In re the Marriage of: David Michael Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Joel S. Rabbe, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Rice v. Perl , (plaintiff was diligent in seeking discovery when defendants moved for summary judgment roughly two weeks after filing of complaint, and it was therefore error for district court to deny plaintiff’s motion for continuance); Cargill, d at 231 (denying motion for continuance when Cargill
- Mary A. Zirbes v. Meshbesher and Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Mary A. Zirbes v. Meshbesher and Spence, Ltd.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An attorney owes a fiduciary duty “to represent the client with undivided loyalty, to preserve the client’s confidences, and to disclose any material matters bearing upon the representation of these obligations.” (emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted).
- Joel Wells v. Rick E. Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Joel Wells v. Rick E. Mattox
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An attorney owes a fiduciary duty “to represent the client with undivided loyalty, to preserve the client’s confidences, and to disclose any material matters bearing upon the representation of these obligations.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
- Newman-Lakka Cancer Foundation v. Christine E. Briggs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Newman-Lakka Cancer Foundation v. Christine E. Briggs
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A motion for jurisdictional discovery must be supported by more than speculation that relevant information exists, and a party generally may not use discovery to conduct a “fishing expedition.”
- Erik Finstad v. Ride Auto, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Erik Finstad v. Ride Auto, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
9 party’s request pursuant to rule 56.06: (1) whether the requesting party was diligent in seeking discovery prior to consideration of the summary-judgment motion, and (2) whether the requesting party based his or her request for further discovery on a good- faith belief that material facts would be uncovered, or whether the exercise is merely a “fishing expedition.”
- In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
- In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
- Jacob Brown, a minor, by his legal guardian Megan Brown v. Duluth Steam Cooperative Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Jacob Brown, a minor, by his legal guardian Megan Brown v. Duluth Steam Cooperative Association
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Browns acknowledge that they did not request a continuance until midway through their closing argument but nevertheless argue that their request was “timely.”
- In the Matter of the Petition of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for a New Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In the Matter of the Petition of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for a New Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n
804 N.W.2d 366
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
On appeal, for granting a continuance of a summary-judgment motion in order to conduct discovery, applies to a motion to compel discovery made before a motion for summary judgment is considered.
- City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
- Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc. 781 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc. 781 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- QBE Insurance Corp. v. Twin Homes of French Ridge Homeowners Ass'n 778 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
QBE Insurance Corp. v. Twin Homes of French Ridge Homeowners Ass'n
778 N.W.2d 393
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(requiring party seeking continuance to show diligence in seeking discovery and good faith belief that material facts will be uncovered).
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.
756 N.W.2d 907
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See In re Trusts A & B of Divine, -18 (Minn.App.2004) (trustees and beneficiaries); (attorneys and clients); Commercial Assocs., Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc., (general partners and limited partners); (directors or officers and corporations), review dismissed (Minn. Nov.
- State v. Campbell 756 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
State v. Campbell
756 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(fiduciary relationship existed when the person claiming a beneficial interest in a family trust had a familial relationship with two of the trustees and had given over complete control of her financial affairs to one of the trustees); (an attorney as fiduciary); cf. Carlson, d at 331 (holding that while an architect/client relationship is not a fiduciary relationship per se, the facts of a particular case might create such a relationship).
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC
756 N.W.2d 93
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
and (2) Is [appellant] seeking further discovery in the good faith belief that material facts will be uncovered, or is she merely engaging in a ‘fishing expedition?’ ”
- Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc.
732 N.W.2d 324
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
provides authority that a remedy for the breach of a fiduciary relationship can be the return of fees paid by the client to the professional, the sine qua non of that remedy is the existence of a fiduciary relationship.
- Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms
719 N.W.2d 226
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
There is a “presumption in favor of granting continuances to allow sufficient time for discovery!?]”
- Noske v. Friedberg 713 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Noske v. Friedberg
713 N.W.2d 866
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
3 See, e.g., Jerry’s Enters., d at 811 (breach of contract); (breach of fiduciary duty); (professional negligence), review denied (Minn. Oct.
- Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc. 712 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Dunham v. Roer
708 N.W.2d 552
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
There is a “presumption in favor of granting continuances to allow sufficient time for discovery.”
- Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. Paulson 699 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. Paulson
699 N.W.2d 1
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(“[A]n attorney at law who is unfaithful in the performance of his duties forfeits his right to compensation.”).